Present: Andrea, David W., Mike, Ralph, John G., Jon

Minutes:
- which kind of document should be written?
   - Looked at http://www.gridforum.org/documents/GFD.152.pdf
   - Could be either a Community Practice Document (CPD) or Recommendation Track Document (RTD)
     - CPU accounting document in the direction of CPD exists already
     - StAR is closer to a CPD
     - Consensus at OGF33 to have a new UR document with profiles for CPU and storage - (that could be more suitable as 
a RTD?)
     - StAR document is close to finished document - what is missing to convert it to a CPD?
        - To be investigated (who should do it?)
        - getting StAR out should be top priority

- should TimeDuration or ValidDuration go in the final definition of UR?
  - how should be decided? Any idea or written rule from OGF?
    - Best to put arguments for and against the controversial topics on wiki (one thread per topic), have a couple of 
iterations of discussion and then vote if still needed
  - Andrea and Jon should come with arguments for TimeDuration and ValidDuration and put in wiki (two threads)
    - will do it within next phone meeting
  - and how about space allocation?
    - John will put in arguments for this in wiki

- How should work progress?
  - put everything in gridforge (minutes etc.)
  - David will find out the process on changing chairs of the group and about the gridforge
  - Will have meetings regularly 15:00 CET, same channel

Actions:
- Investigate what is needed to convert StAR to a community practice document - who?
- Create discussion threads (with pro's and con's)
  - for TimeDuration - Andrea
  - for ValidDuration - Jon
  - Space allocation - John G.
- Find out and distribute on mailing list what to do with new chairs and gridforge access - David W.