This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf3425?nav=1&selectedTab=comments at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 08:44:41 GMT SourceForge : artf3425: (1166) A GridRPC Model and API for End-User Applications

Project Home

Tracker

Documents

Tasks

Source Code

Discussions

File Releases

Wiki

Project Admin
Search Tracker
Project: Editor     Trackers > Published > View Artifact
Artifact artf3425 : (1166) A GridRPC Model and API for End-User Applications
Tracker: Published
Title: (1166) A GridRPC Model and API for End-User Applications
Description:
GridRPC Working Group
.
Submitted By: Yoshio Tanaka
Submitted On: 01/06/2005 9:26 PM EST
Last Modified: 11/07/2007 3:24 PM EST

Status / Comments Change Log Associations Attachments (4)  
Status  
Group: * APME
Status:* Closed
Category: * Community Practice
Customer: *
Priority: * 1
Assigned To: * Joel Replogle
Reported in Release: *
Fixed in Release: *
Estimated Hours: * 0
Actual Hours: * 0
resolution: * Accepted
Comments
Greg Newby: 11/07/2007 3:24 PM EST
  Action: Move
Moved from Submit OGF Draft to Published
Category changed from Recommendations Track to Community Practice
Group changed from Applications to APME
Status changed from Ready to Publish to Closed
Greg Newby: 09/04/2007 10:22 AM EDT
  Comment:
Per the GFSG on September 4 2007, this document is now moved to full recommendation status as GFD-R.022.

We'll update the header/footer,
add an annotation in the dates section,
update the copyright & IP statement,
and announce
  Action: Update
Assigned To set to Joel Replogle
Category changed from Community Practice to Recommendations Track
Priority changed from 0 to 1
Status changed from AD Review to Ready to Publish
Greg Newby: 09/04/2007 10:20 AM EDT
  Action: Move
Moved from Published to Submit OGF Draft
Category changed from Recommendation to Community Practice
Group set to Applications
resolution set to Accepted
Status changed from Open to AD Review
Greg Newby: 09/04/2007 10:19 AM EDT
  Action: Update
Closed changed from 09/27/2005 to none (no value)
Status changed from Closed to Open
Greg Newby: 05/06/2007 4:46 AM EDT
  Action: Update
resolution changed from PUBLISHED to none (no value)
Greg Newby: 09/27/2005 1:13 AM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Closed
Category changed from <None> to Recommendation
close_date changed from - to 2005-09-26 22:13:04
resolution changed from <None> to PUBLISHED
Greg Newby: 09/27/2005 1:02 AM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_group changed from Applications to <None>
artifact_status changed from Closed to Open
Category changed from Recommendations Track to <None>
group_artifact_id changed from Submit GGF Draft to Published
Priority changed from 5 to -
resolution changed from Published to <None>
Joel Replogle: 09/26/2005 11:20 PM EST
  Comment:
Published as GFD.52 on 26 September, 2005
  Action: Update
Joel Replogle: 09/26/2005 11:20 PM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from ready to publish to Closed
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 100
close_date changed from - to 2005-09-27 00:20:51
Priority changed from 1 to 5
Greg Newby: 09/06/2005 9:42 AM EST
  Comment:
The GFSG has confirmed readiness of this document for
publication.  We'll add the header/footer, and publish
this as a Draft Recommendation as document #52
(GFD-R-P.052).  (#51 is already assigned to another
document.)

Thanks to the authors for their efforts concerning
this document.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 09/06/2005 9:42 AM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Final 15day GFSG Review to ready to publish
assigned_to changed from 137 to 9357
Priority changed from 2 to 1
resolution changed from Accepted to Published
Dennis Gannon: 08/25/2005 7:25 PM EST
  Comment:
The document is now in good shape.  It is good to have it
now available for other to implement.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 08/23/2005 10:12 AM EST
  Action: Update
assigned_to changed from 100 to 137
Greg Newby: 08/23/2005 10:09 AM EST
  Comment:
This needs shepherding by Dennis Gannon (who was not
previously available on the tracker "who" listing).

We'll return it to 15-day GFSG review until we can hear
from Dennis.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 08/23/2005 10:09 AM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_group changed from old-APME to Applications
assigned_to changed from 130 to 100
Greg Newby: 08/07/2005 9:01 PM EST
  Comment:
I made two very small changes to GridRPC_July21.doc: 
added a title 
("A GridRPC Model and API for End-User Applications") and
joined the Intellectual Property header to its following
paragraph -- also regenerated the Table of Contents.

This document is now in final 15-day GFSG review.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 08/07/2005 9:01 PM EST
  Attachment: GridRPC_July21b.doc (260 KB)
  Action: Update
File added set to 663: GridRPC_July21b.doc
Greg Newby: 08/07/2005 8:52 PM EST
  Comment:
The revised document, as well as a response
to public comment, are now available (via email
from Yoshio Tanaka).
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 08/07/2005 8:52 PM EST
  Attachment: PublicCommentsforGridRPCDocument.doc (116.5 KB)
  Action: Update
File added set to 662: PublicCommentsforGridRPCDocument.doc
artifact_status changed from Pending Info from Authors to Final 15day GFSG Review
Priority changed from 4 to 2
resolution changed from Returned to Authors/Group to Accepted
Greg Newby: 06/26/2005 1:14 PM EST
  Comment:
Consideration is in progress, per email communication
on June 20.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 04/28/2005 9:42 AM EST
  Comment:
Public comment is now complete.  Authors: please review
and respond to the comments, and if needed upload a new
version of the document.  Please use this tracker to indicate
when you are done, so taht we may move this document
to the next phase.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 04/28/2005 9:42 AM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Public Comment Period to Pending Info from Authors
assigned_to changed from 111 to 130
Priority changed from 3 to 4
resolution changed from Accepted to Returned to Authors/Group
Greg Newby: 04/12/2005 10:59 AM EST
  Comment:
Note: public comments are available at this URL:
  https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=472
  Action: Update
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 02/21/2005 2:19 PM EST
  Comment:
This document will now enter a 60 day public comment period. 

Due Date: 4-21-05
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 02/18/2005 7:14 PM EST
  Action: Update
assigned_to changed from 434 to 111
Greg Newby: 02/18/2005 7:13 PM EST
  Comment:
This draft has completed the necessary steps prior to
being made available for public comment.  Authors, 
working group / research group chairs, and Area
Directors should encourage individuals to participate
in the public comment process and should announce
the public comment availability to appropriate
communities and groups.

Public comments can be viewed and submitted via
the GridForge Editor pages (see Forums) or:

http://www.ggf.org/documents

Public comments play an important part in the advancement
of a GGF draft and publication as a document in the 
GGF document series.

An active public comment period strengthens the case
that the document is a useful and desired work product
for some community of consumers.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 02/18/2005 7:13 PM EST
  Attachment: GridRPC_Feb17.doc (241.5 KB)
  Action: Update
File added set to 560: GridRPC_Feb17.doc
artifact_status changed from Pending Info from Authors to Public Comment Period
Priority changed from 4 to 3
resolution changed from Returned to Authors/Group to Accepted
Greg Newby: 02/15/2005 12:41 PM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from GFSG Review to Pending Info from Authors
resolution changed from <None> to Returned to Authors/Group
Greg Newby: 02/15/2005 12:40 PM EST
  Comment:
Thanks for this submission.  As of the February 15 GFSG conference call, this document has been voted on and approved for moving forward.  Once the 
authors respond to the items below (or decide to put them off until after the public comment period), we will put this into 60-day public comment.

These are some relatively minor formatting issues.  They could be addressed before or after the public comment period, but to address them before will
 be one fewer simple item for people to comment on.

1. The copyright date should be 2005 at the top & bottom copyright sections
2. The Table of Contents should be at the top
3. The running header needs to have a 1" margin.  Now, it's far less
4. You need to submit a .doc or other editable version to the document pipeline
5. See my advice for Security Considerations in the Editor project page.  Yours is not sufficient: you should address or point to security 
considerations for GridRPC.
6. Your references #15 and #20 are not to documents, so should not be in the references section.  These should be cited in-line.

Overall, the level of detail in the technical content seems to be appropriate for a draft recommendation.  I would not mind seeing an example (in 
addition to Figure 1) that shows what an RPC communication instance might look like, but I understand that the desire might be to just focus on the 
recommendation detail.
  Action: Update
Satoshi Matsuoka: 02/15/2005 12:28 PM EST
  Comment:
We should move it forward as historically partly with my mistake this has been in Limbo. There are concrete implementations and users on this API with
 real Grid apps, and is an evolution of almost 10 years of R&D on this subject by all parties involved.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 01/25/2005 2:24 PM EST
  Comment:
That would be February 15 for the deadline for the GFSG review.  Sorry for my repeated mis-typing!
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 01/25/2005 11:38 AM EST
  Action: Update
Priority changed from 5 to 4
Greg Newby: 01/25/2005 11:37 AM EST
  Comment:
Sorry - my last tracker entry was a mistake.  Per the Jan 25 conference call, this document is now in GFSG review until January 15.

This document is NOT yet in public comment.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 01/25/2005 11:37 AM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from AD Review to GFSG Review
Greg Newby: 01/25/2005 11:35 AM EST
  Comment:
This draft has completed the necessary steps prior to
being made available for public comment.  Authors, 
working group / research group chairs, and Area
Directors should encourage individuals to participate
in the public comment process and should announce
the public comment availability to appropriate
communities and groups.

Public comments can be viewed and submitted via
the GridForge Editor pages (see Forums) or:

http://www.ggf.org/documents

Public comments play an important part in the advancement
of a GGF draft and publication as a document in the 
GGF document series.

An active public comment period strengthens the case
that the document is a useful and desired work product
for some community of consumers.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 01/25/2005 11:32 AM EST
  Comment:
Per the Jan 25 conference call: Craig Lee (AD) says this is ready to go forward.

Satoshi mentioned there are existing implementations that have tested this already.
  Action: Update
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 01/07/2005 12:19 PM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Open to AD Review
assigned_to changed from 108 to 434
Priority changed from - to 5
Yoshio Tanaka: 01/06/2005 9:26 PM EST
  Action: Create

Yoshio Tanaka: 01/06/2005 9:26 PM EST
  Attachment: End-User_API_23_Sept_04.pdf (126.66 KB)
  Action: Update
File added set to 534: End-User_API_23_Sept_04.pdf

 
 
 
< Previous
 
 
Next >
 


The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf3425?nav=1&selectedTab=comments at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 08:44:41 GMT