This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/Actions_rendering_2.0 at Fri, 04 Nov 2022 18:29:26 GMT SourceForge : View Wiki Page: Actions_rendering_2.0

Project Home

Tracker

Documents

Tasks

Source Code

Discussions

File Releases

Wiki

Project Admin
Search Wiki Pages Project: GLUE     Wiki > Actions_rendering_2.0 > View Wiki Page
wiki2497: Actions_rendering_2.0
  1. Paul: to check that associations in document are consistent with XSD for Storage entities
    1. DONE: XSD now consistent with document, except for StorageShare--StorageShareCapacity, which is PC rather than AE.
  2. Sergio: to check that associations in document are consistent with XSD for Main/Computing entities
  3. Sergio: to add annotations to Main/Computing entities
  4. Sergio: add addresses of Adrian/Shiraz at the end of the document;
    1. DONE: added Address from Shiraz
  5. Sergio: add final XSD in the doc
  6. Sergio: add diagram with structure of XML doc
    1. DONE: to be finalized
  7. Sergio: announce the last call to the list
  8. Adrian: http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc15518
    1. add LDAP schema (use compile-schema.sh to create one file, https://github.com/OGF-GLUE/LDAP)
    2. read the all doc and check for consistency
  9. Ilya: if confirmed 7 april,
    1. update SQL repo
    2. update the wiki: http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/GLUE2Relational
    3. upload the new document to: http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc15518
  10. Paul/Adrian/Balazs/Sergio/Shiraz: the diagram needs to be double-checked and few relationships still miss; especially, I've a question. In the conceptual model we capture a service-to-service relationship. This is then inherited by the computing and storage services. In the XML Schema, we model only the association end "ServiceID" and not "ComputingServiceID" and "StorageServiceID". Which relationships we want to capture in the XSD? In theory all these could be possible:
    1. Service<->Service
    2. ComputingSevice<->Service
    3. ComputingSevice<->ComputingService
    4. ComputingSevice<->StorageService
    5. StorageService<->StorageService
  11. Paul/Adrian/Balazs/Sergio/Shiraz: AdminDomain<-->AdminDomain; UserDomain<-->UserDomain
    1. do we stay on "parent-child" or move to "association end"?

 



Versions Associations Attachments Back Links  
Version Version Comment Created By
Version 4 Paul Millar - 04/07/2011
Version 3 Sergio Andreozzi - 04/06/2011
Version 2 Sergio Andreozzi - 04/06/2011
Version 1 Sergio Andreozzi - 04/06/2011



The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/Actions_rendering_2.0 at Fri, 04 Nov 2022 18:29:36 GMT