This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf6578?nav=1&selectedTab=comments at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 14:38:50 GMT SourceForge : artf6578: existsDuring relation

Project Home

Tracker

Documents

Tasks

Source Code

Discussions

File Releases

Wiki

Project Admin

NML-WG Homepage
Search Tracker
Project: NML-WG     Trackers > Schema Progress > View Artifact
Artifact artf6578 : existsDuring relation
Tracker: Schema Progress
Title: existsDuring relation
Description:
NML defines a Lifetime object, which can be related to a Network Object. This relation is currently unnamed.

Proposal: use the name "existsDuring" relation to identify this relation.

(I'm not sure if we need to name it in the syntax, but at least it is useful so we can refer to it in the document)

Meaning of the relation is as follows:
* A LifeTime object only has a single start and endtime.
* A Network Object can be related to zero, one or more LifeTime objects.
* If a Network Object is related to one or more LifeTime objects, this should be interpreted that the Network Object is 
guaranteed to be "in service" during these times. It implicitly can be assumed that it is not in service during non-
specified times.
* If a Network Object is related to zero LifeTime objects, there is no guarantee when the Network Object is "in service"
, but it may implicitly be assumed that it is in service from the moment of reception of the NML description till the 
publication of an updated NML description (whenever that may be).
Submitted By: Freek Dijkstra
Submitted On: 07/30/2012 4:46 AM EDT
Last Modified: 11/30/2012 7:42 AM EST
Closed: 11/30/2012 7:42 AM EST

Status / Comments Change Log Associations Attachments  
Status  
Status:* Completed
Category:* UML schema
Priority: * 4
Assigned To: * None
Comments
Jeroen van der Ham: 11/30/2012 7:42 AM EST
  Comment:
has been added as an implicit relationship, and is part of the document.
  Action: Update
Closed set to 11/30/2012
Status changed from Under discussion to Completed
Jeroen van der Ham: 08/17/2012 7:55 AM EDT
  Comment:
Good point.
https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/artf6537?nav=1 describes how implicit relations should be handled.

We should add this one to https://forge.ogf.org/sf/sfmain/do/go/artf6547 as an implicit relation.
  Action: Update
Jason Zurawski: 08/16/2012 11:51 AM EDT
  Comment:
Alright, if it makes RDF easier, but wasn't there some other issue where we had to make rules/distinctions about the use of containment vs relations? 
 If so, the same rules probably need to apply here since we want to limit the ways things can be done.  
  Action: Update
Jeroen van der Ham: 08/16/2012 11:49 AM EDT
  Comment:
We need a relationship for the RDF syntax...
  Action: Update
Jason Zurawski: 08/16/2012 8:40 AM EDT
  Comment:
Wouldn't the lifetime being contained in a network object be enough to go on?  Adding the relationship doesn't seem necessary.  
  Action: Update
Freek Dijkstra: 07/30/2012 4:46 AM EDT
  Action: Create


 
 
 
< Previous
 
 
Next >
 


The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf6578?nav=1&selectedTab=comments at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 14:38:50 GMT