This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/go/artf6537?nav=1 at Fri, 04 Nov 2022 23:46:53 GMT SourceForge : artf6537: hasTopology implicitly defined?
Home Projects Search
User Password Logins Disabled Help

Project Home
Tracker
Documents
Tasks
Source Code
Discussions
File Releases
Wiki
Project Admin
NML-WG Homepage
Search Tracker
Project: NML-WG     Trackers > Schema Progress > View Artifact
Artifact artf6537 : hasTopology implicitly defined?
Tracker: Schema Progress
Title: hasTopology implicitly defined?
Description: 
When one topology is contained within the other, the default implicit relation is hasTopology:

 <nml:Topology id="urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2012:NORDUnet">
   <nml:Topology id="urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2012:NORDUnet:Scandinavia"/>
 </nml:Topology>

is equivalent to

 <nml:Topology id="urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2012:NORDUnet">
   <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/relations#hasTopology">
     <nml:Topology id="urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2012:NORDUnet:Scandinavia"/>
   </nml:Relation>
 </nml:Topology>

The following rules apply to implicit relations:
* A client SHOULD leave out the implicit relation when writing NML in XML format, but instead use a direct child element
.
* parsers MUST accept the implicit relation
* parsers SHOULD accept the explicit relation

See artf6547 for a full list of implicit relations.

See: https://forge.ogf.org/integration/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/201203-subtopology/hasTopology.xml?rev=20&content-

type=text%2Fplain&system=exsy1001&root=nml-examples
Submitted By: Jeroen van der Ham
Submitted On: 03/14/2012 10:21 AM EDT
Last Modified: 11/30/2012 7:54 AM EST
Closed: 11/30/2012 7:54 AM EST

Status / Comments Change Log Associations Attachments (1)  
 (9 Items)
Field Old Value New Value Date Performed By
Closed 11/30/2012 11/30/2012 7:54 AM EST Jeroen van der Ham
Status 
Last Call
 
Completed
 11/30/2012 7:54 AM EST Jeroen van der Ham
Description 
When one topology is contained within the other, the default implicit relation 
is hasTopology:

<nml:Topology id="a">
  <nml:Topology id="a:b"/>
</nml:Topology>

See: https://forge.ogf.org/integration/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/201203-
subTopology/hasTopology.xml?rev=20&content-type=text%2Fplain&system=exsy1001&
root=nml-examples

When one topology is contained within the other, the default implicit relation 
is hasTopology:

<nml:Topology id="a">
  <nml:Topology id="a:b"/>
</nml:Topology>

See: https://forge.ogf.org/integration/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/201203-
subtopology/hasTopology.xml?rev=20&content-type=text%2Fplain&system=exsy1001&
root=nml-examples
03/14/2012 2:12 PM EDT Jeroen van der Ham
Description 
When one topology is contained within the other, the default implicit relation 
is hasTopology:

<nml:Topology id="a">
  <nml:Topology id="a:b"/>
</nml:Topology>

When one topology is contained within the other, the default implicit relation 
is hasTopology:

<nml:Topology id="a">
  <nml:Topology id="a:b"/>
</nml:Topology>

See: https://forge.ogf.org/integration/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/201203-
subTopology/hasTopology.xml?rev=20&content-type=text%2Fplain&system=exsy1001&
root=nml-examples
03/14/2012 2:11 PM EDT Jeroen van der Ham
Status 
Under discussion
 
Last Call
 08/08/2012 9:17 AM EDT Freek Dijkstra
Category 
– Network / Topology / Domain
 
XML syntax
 08/08/2012 9:17 AM EDT Freek Dijkstra
Description 
When one topology is contained within the other, the default implicit relation 
is hasTopology:

<nml:Topology id="a">
  <nml:Topology id="a:b"/>
</nml:Topology>

See: https://forge.ogf.org/integration/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/201203-
subtopology/hasTopology.xml?rev=20&content-type=text%2Fplain&system=exsy1001&
root=nml-examples

When one topology is contained within the other, the default implicit relation 
is hasTopology:

 <nml:Topology id="urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2012:NORDUnet">
   <nml:Topology id="urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2012:NORDUnet:Scandinavia"/>
 </nml:Topology>

is equivalent to

 <nml:Topology id="urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2012:NORDUnet">
   <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/relations#hasTopology"
>;
     <nml:Topology id="urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2012:NORDUnet:Scandinavia"/>
   </nml:Relation>
 </nml:Topology>

The following rules apply to implicit relations:
* A client SHOULD leave out the implicit relation when writing NML in XML format
, but instead use a direct child element.
* parsers MUST accept the implicit relation
* parsers SHOULD accept the explicit relation

See artf6547 for a full list of implicit relations.

See: https://forge.ogf.org/integration/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/201203-
subtopology/hasTopology.xml?rev=20&content-
type=text%2Fplain&system=exsy1001&root=nml-examples
 08/08/2012 9:16 AM EDT Freek Dijkstra
Status 
New
 
Under discussion
 03/28/2012 10:10 AM EDT Freek Dijkstra
Category 
Procedural
 
– Network / Topology / Domain
 03/28/2012 10:10 AM EDT Freek Dijkstra

 
Return
 
 
< Previous
 
 
Next >
 

The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/go/artf6537?nav=1 at Fri, 04 Nov 2022 23:47:05 GMT