This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf2717?nav=1&selectedTab=comments at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 12:26:27 GMT SourceForge : artf2717: (932) Model for derived data services

Project Home

Tracker

Documents

Tasks

Source Code

Discussions

File Releases

Wiki

Project Admin
Search Tracker
Project: DAIS-WG     Trackers > WS-DAI Issues > View Artifact
Artifact artf2717 : (932) Model for derived data services
Tracker: WS-DAI Issues
Title: (932) Model for derived data services
Description:
The model of derived services presented does not map consistently for all types of data resources
E.g. you may create an empty file and the add data to it but you create a new database table and interact with the 
database to insert data
This feels ok but we need a clear way of documenting expected use patterns. We need a new primer. 
.
Submitted By: Simon Laws
Submitted On: 06/22/2004 4:28 AM EST
Last Modified: 08/25/2004 8:33 AM EST
Closed: 08/25/2004 8:33 AM EST

Status / Comments Change Log Associations Attachments  
Status  
Group: *
Status:* Closed
Category: *
Customer: *
Priority: * 2
Assigned To: * Simon Laws
Reported in Release: *
Fixed in Release: *
Estimated Hours: * 0
Actual Hours: * 0
Comments
Simon Laws: 08/25/2004 8:33 AM EST
  Comment:
Added comments to base spec for GGF12 pointing out that while the model is useful we recognise that it is not universally and consistently applicable.
  Action: Update
Simon Laws: 08/25/2004 8:33 AM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Closed
close_date changed from - to 2004-08-25 14:33:41
Norman Paton: 07/26/2004 5:21 PM EST
  Comment:
This doesn't seem to be expressed quite precisely enough to make explicit the claim.  Is the claim:

(1) that there are things in the current realisations that seem inconstent, such as the use of fine-grained collection management interfaces in WS-
DAIX as against the use of a single language-based operation in WS-DAIR; or
 
(ii) the fact that different kinds of resource implement interfaces that seem different in nature (e.g. to stick with examples in the spec, that 
SQLAccess is not like RowSetAccess).

If (i), then I suspect we have no choice, as this directly reflects the varying capabilities of the underlying resource languages. If (ii) the only 
question is whether more common behavioral patterns should be pulled into the WS-DAI specification.  That may be worth wider consideration, but people
 haven't been coming forward with such patterns that I remember, so our  broad access patterns have been stable for a long time.
  Action: Update
Simon Laws: 06/22/2004 4:28 AM EST
  Action: Create


 
 
 
< Previous
 
 
Next >
 


The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf2717?nav=1&selectedTab=comments at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 12:26:27 GMT