|
Comment: |
This doesn't seem to be expressed quite precisely enough to make explicit the claim. Is the claim:
(1) that there are things in the current realisations that seem inconstent, such as the use of fine-grained collection management interfaces in WS-
DAIX as against the use of a single language-based operation in WS-DAIR; or
(ii) the fact that different kinds of resource implement interfaces that seem different in nature (e.g. to stick with examples in the spec, that
SQLAccess is not like RowSetAccess).
If (i), then I suspect we have no choice, as this directly reflects the varying capabilities of the underlying resource languages. If (ii) the only
question is whether more common behavioral patterns should be pulled into the WS-DAI specification. That may be worth wider consideration, but people
haven't been coming forward with such patterns that I remember, so our broad access patterns have been stable for a long time.
|