03/13/2009 2:44 PM
post6106
|
Re: PGI TelCon 2009-03-13 - 4.p.m. OGF25 Debrief TelCon
I am afraid that my voice was NOT audible, so I have written down my thoughts here.
(1) OGF25 Summarizing shortly our sessions, going through the minutes on GridForge
Through its discussion thread, I have updated the summary of Standard Working Session 2 : WSDL files need description
in human-readable format.
(2) Addressing Comments: Liaisons with other working groups: SRM, JSDL, BES, etc.
SECURITY :
- At OGF25, there was an 'OGSA Authz Working Group' session led by David CHADWICK and Valerio VENTURI, and described at
http://www.ogf.org/gf/event_schedule/index.php?id=1532
I am sorry, but I did NOT attend this session.
The existence of this session indicates that the OGSA-AUTHZ Working Group is perhaps still alive.
I am wondering if the work that the PGI group is trying to perform about security should perhaps be performed inside
this OGSA-AUTHZ Working Group ?
If PGI decides to perform valuable work on security OUTSIDE the OGSA-AUTHZ Working Group, PGI has to clearly write
down the reasons.
- In any way, recommendations on security can be implemented in production ONLY after a thorough review and a written
approval by JSPG, which is defining the Security Policy of at least EGEE, NorduGrid and OSG.
- So, beyond David GROEP, I can suggest following contacts :
- JSPG : David KELSEY, Christoph WITZIG (I think that both attended PGI sessions at OGF25)
- OGSA-AUTHZ : David CHADWICK, Valerio VENTURI
- I will attend the MWSG Meeting in Zürich on 30 March 2009 with Morris.
(3) Addressing Comments: (possible) prioritization to focus efforts:
I fully agree.
(4) Addressing Comments: Possible slit-up to sub-groups following the different priorizations
I agree. I will try to attend both telephone conferences.
(5) Addressing Comments: production Grids and driving forces of PGI
- As a sustainable infrastructure, EDGeS is a small fish (only a 2-years project with less than 100 people),
- But a Computing Resources, EDGeS is a BIG fish (potentially MILLIONS of destop computers).
As I already stated, EDGeS has NO brand new Security, Job or Data model, but works on bridges between computing grids.
Inside its bridges, EDGeS would NOT like to implement a lot of grid-specific plugins (interoperation), but only a few
OGF-compliant plugins (interoperability).
(6) Other comments by participants of the TelCon
Using telephone number +9900827049931906, my voice was NOT audible.
I order to avoid that in the next conferences, I make following proposals :
- Use a real SKYPE meeting, and invite telephone number +9900827049931906 for those who can not join SKYPE.
Below are some Skype pseudos that I already found :
- Andrew GRIMSHAW uvagrimshaw
- Balazs KONYA balazs.konya
- Moreno MARZOLLA moreno7663
- Morris RIEDEL MorrisRiedel
- Gabor ROCZEI roczey
- Oxana SMIRNOVA oxana.smirnova
- Etienne URBAH etienne.urbah
- Johannes WATZL bratschist
- David WALLOM d_wallom
- Use the video conferencing infrastructure of my IN2P3-LAL institute :
- IN2P3 has a Video Conferencing Server (MCU) at ccmcu40.in2p3.fr
- LAL has several rooms with H323 equipment, and I can easily book one for each Friday at 16h00 CET.
|
|
|
03/13/2009 2:50 PM
post6107
|
Re: PGI TelCon 2009-03-13 - 4.p.m. OGF25 Debrief TelCon
Participants of the Telcon:
Andrew Grimshaw
Duane Merrill
Steven Newhouse
Etienne Urbah
Benjamin Henne
David Wallom
Morris Riedel (chair)
Others...
Sorry for missing some folks in my list, please add yourself here.
Take care,
Morris
|
|
|
03/16/2009 12:42 PM
post6109
|
Re: PGI TelCon 2009-03-13 - 4.p.m. OGF25 Debrief TelCon
Sorry for having missed the meeting, had to tend for some students.
A couple of comments:
- No splitting,please. If the group grows too big to be maintained, it will need to be reduced to its original efficient
core.
- I do see these Wednesday meetings as a very unfortunate sign of a split that goes against the original group intention
. Let me remind again: the group aims at transferring "academic" versions of BES. JSDL and GLUE into one-two profiles
that are used in production. Separating BES and JSDL from GLUE and security is counterproductive, IMHO - or at least is
against the original group intention. I have nothing against Andrew taking care of BES and JSDL, but this is not the
remit of PGI, where "P" stands for "Production".
|
|
|