This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/go/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.rec_ws_agreement_spec_1.several_comments at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 09:02:43 GMT SourceForge : Post

Project Home

Tracker

Documents

Tasks

Source Code

Discussions

File Releases

Wiki

Project Admin
Project: Editor     Discussion > REC: WS-Agreement Spec > several comments > List of Posts
Forum Topic - several comments: (1 Item)
View:  as 
 
 
several comments
I have reviewed the WS-Agreement specification and have some comments and questions to be clarified.


1. On page 6-7, table of external specifications,

    I can not find specific version numbers in the Spec Version Column.
    Please provide them in the "Spec Version Column".


2. On page 10, table of prefix and namespace.

    I suggest replacing the below URLs with those of the standard bodies.

    wsbf http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/stdwip/web-services/WS-BaseFaults
    wssg http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/stdwip/web-services/WS-ServiceGroup
    wsrp http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/stdwip/web-services/WSResourceProperties


3. On page 26, section 4.2.6.2, third sentence.

    I don't understand what part of the referenced document [XQUERYX]
  is relevant in terms of "a generic assertion language".
    Please elaborate more to clarify this.


4. On page 49-50, 13 References.

    I believe the URIs for standard bodies should be used for WS-*
  specifications, rather than the private comanies one,
  even if they contain the equivalent contents.


5. On page 50, [XQUERYX].

    The status of the draft is wrong. 
    Please replace the W3C Working Draft with the W3C Candidate
Recommendation. 
    Also, I believe the URIs for standard bodies should be used here.


6. On page 50, [JSDL]

    I suggest updating this reference with the officially published version.
  Also it should be referenced in Appendix 2.


7. On page 50, [XML-ns] [ComputeJobs]

    I suggest removing these reference since they are not referenced
  in fact in the other places.


  I appreciate your effort to answer my comments and questions.

Best Regards,
Naoya Fujisaki
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd.

 
 


The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/go/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.rec_ws_agreement_spec_1.several_comments at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 09:02:43 GMT