This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/go/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.rec_secure_addressing_profile_1.topc4190 at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 09:02:56 GMT SourceForge : Post

Project Home

Tracker

Documents

Tasks

Source Code

Discussions

File Releases

Wiki

Project Admin
Project: Editor     Discussion > REC:Secure Addressing Profile 1.0 > One comment for the document. > List of Posts
Forum Topic - One comment for the document.: (2 Items)
View:  as 
 
 
One comment for the document.
This document is entirely well written and generally good.  My only concern is that C0302 describes that a SECURE_EPR 
document SHOULD incorporate digital signing as per this section of the profile, i.e. digital signing is not MUST but 
SHOULD.  I think digital signature should be mandartory.
Re: One comment for the document.
Resolution: changed this from a recommendation to a requirement

-Duane

 
 


The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/go/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.rec_secure_addressing_profile_1.topc4190 at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 09:02:56 GMT