This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/go/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.info_gridcpr_use_cases.document_needs_only_minor_improv at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 09:02:55 GMT SourceForge : Post

Project Home

Tracker

Documents

Tasks

Source Code

Discussions

File Releases

Wiki

Project Admin
Project: Editor     Discussion > INFO:GridCPR Use Cases > document needs only minor improvements > List of Posts
Forum Topic - document needs only minor improvements: (3 Items)
View:  as 
 
 
document needs only minor improvements
(Although I am listed as author, I have contributed only in the early phases 
 of the work, so I dare commenting... ;-) 
 
Bassically, I think this report is fulfilling its purpose. It needs, however, 
 a careful final proofreading and bug fixing. 
 
I would suggest to promote the AAA paragraph (lines numbered 279-282) to the 
 required security sectin, including some more detailed thoughts on security 
 aspects of GridCPR systems. 
 
Finally, I find the Acknowledgements section inappropriate for a GGF document. 
 Even if one or more authors have used the mentioned NSF grant, I doubt that 
 the content, being the result of a group effort, can be declared "based 
 upon work supported by NSF grant XYZ..." 
(Or did anybody get explicit NSF money for creating a GridCPR standard???)
Re: document needs only minor improvements
> (Although I am listed as author, I have contributed only in the early phases 
>  of the work, so I dare commenting... ;-) 
>  
> Bassically, I think this report is fulfilling its purpose. It needs, however, 
>  a careful final proofreading and bug fixing. 

NOT completely addressed yet I think...

 
> I would suggest to promote the AAA paragraph (lines numbered 279-282) to the 
>  required security sectin, including some more detailed thoughts on security 
>  aspects of GridCPR systems. 

Addressed: did that, but the paragraph should be reviewed by others.
 
> Finally, I find the Acknowledgements section inappropriate for a GGF document.
>   
>  Even if one or more authors have used the mentioned NSF grant, I doubt that 
>  the content, being the result of a group effort, can be declared "based 
>  upon work supported by NSF grant XYZ..." 
> (Or did anybody get explicit NSF money for creating a GridCPR standard???)

Addressed: acks in OGF docs have been discussed in GFSG, and deemed appropriate.
Re: document needs only minor improvements
> > (Although I am listed as author, I have contributed only in the early phases
>  
> >  of the work, so I dare commenting... ;-) 
> >  
> > Bassically, I think this report is fulfilling its purpose. It needs, however
> , 
> >  a careful final proofreading and bug fixing. 
> 
> NOT completely addressed yet I think...

Shantenu was volonteered to do final proof reading ;-)

 
 


The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/go/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.info_gridcpr_use_cases.document_needs_only_minor_improv at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 09:02:55 GMT