This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/go/artf3420?nav=1 at Thu, 03 Nov 2022 16:03:22 GMT SourceForge : artf3420: (1145) Peer-To-Peer Requirements On The Open Grid Services Architecture Framework

Project Home

Tracker

Documents

Tasks

Source Code

Discussions

File Releases

Wiki

Project Admin
Search Tracker
Project: Editor     Trackers > Published > View Artifact
Artifact artf3420 : (1145) Peer-To-Peer Requirements On The Open Grid Services Architecture Framework
Tracker: Published
Title: (1145) Peer-To-Peer Requirements On The Open Grid Services Architecture Framework
Description:
This is the final version of the document created by the OGSAP2P research group and concludes the work of the group.

- karan
  karan@sdsc.edu.
Submitted By: karan bhatia
Submitted On: 11/20/2004 3:58 PM EST
Last Modified: 05/06/2007 4:46 AM EDT
Closed: 09/27/2005 1:17 AM EST

Status / Comments Change Log Associations Attachments (4)  
Status  
Group: *
Status:* Closed
Category: *
Customer: *
Priority: * 0
Assigned To: * None
Reported in Release: *
Fixed in Release: *
Estimated Hours: * 0
Actual Hours: * 0
resolution: *
Comments
Greg Newby: 05/06/2007 4:46 AM EDT
  Action: Update
resolution changed from PUBLISHED to none (no value)
Greg Newby: 09/27/2005 1:17 AM EST
  Comment:
Mass Update
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Closed
close_date changed from - to 2005-09-26 22:17:03
resolution changed from <None> to PUBLISHED
Greg Newby: 07/13/2005 11:37 PM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_group changed from P2P to <None>
artifact_status changed from Closed to Open
Category changed from Informational to <None>
resolution changed from Published to <None>
Greg Newby: 07/13/2005 11:37 PM EST
  Action: Update
group_artifact_id changed from Submit GGF Draft to Published
Priority changed from 5 to -
Joel Replogle: 07/12/2005 12:33 PM EST
  Comment:
Published as GFD.49 on July 12, 2005
  Action: Update
Joel Replogle: 07/12/2005 12:33 PM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from ready to publish to Closed
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 100
close_date changed from - to 2005-07-12 13:33:36
Priority changed from 1 to 5
Greg Newby: 06/26/2005 3:40 PM EST
  Attachment: GFD-I.049.doc (519 KB)
  Action: Update
File added set to 637: GFD-I.049.doc
Greg Newby: 06/26/2005 3:39 PM EST
  Comment:
Thanks to Cees de Laat for this new edited document, which
I have approved.  This is now published as GFD-49.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 06/26/2005 3:39 PM EST
  Attachment: draft-ogsap2p-req_04.doc (493.5 KB)
  Action: Update
File added set to 636: draft-ogsap2p-req_04.doc
artifact_status changed from Final Editor Review to ready to publish
assigned_to changed from 302 to 9357
resolution changed from <None> to Published
Greg Newby: 06/26/2005 12:34 PM EST
  Comment:
Sorry for the long delay with this.  Cees de Latt and I have
been spending a little time with this, and hope to get the
final edits applied soon.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 02/18/2005 7:22 PM EST
  Comment:
I am reviewing the final document.   This probably does not need further public comment, but does need some editing/fixes still.  My suggestions will 
go back to the author shortly.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 02/18/2005 7:22 PM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Public Comment Period to Final Editor Review
assigned_to changed from 111 to 302
Priority changed from 3 to 1
resolution changed from Works For Me to <None>
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 02/08/2005 11:36 AM EST
  Comment:
This document has ended public comment period but no comments were made. The GGF Editor will determine if this document will enter another 30 day 
public comment period or if it will move forward.
  Action: Update
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 01/07/2005 12:18 PM EST
  Comment:
Document has entered public comment. 

Correction below not should be now
  Action: Update
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 01/07/2005 12:08 PM EST
  Comment:
This document will not enter a 30 day public comment period. 

Due date: February 7, 2005
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 01/06/2005 7:34 PM EST
  Comment:
This draft has completed the necessary steps prior to
being made available for public comment.  Authors, 
working group / research group chairs, and Area
Directors should encourage individuals to participate
in the public comment process and should announce
the public comment availability to appropriate
communities and groups.

Public comments can be viewed and submitted via
the GridForge Editor pages (see Forums) or:

http://www.ggf.org/documents

Public comments play an important part in the advancement
of a GGF draft and publication as a document in the 
GGF document series.

An active public comment period strengthens the case
that the document is a useful and desired work product
for some community of consumers.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 01/06/2005 7:34 PM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Initial Editor Review to Public Comment Period
assigned_to changed from 302 to 111
Priority changed from 4 to 3
resolution changed from <None> to Works For Me
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 01/05/2005 12:38 PM EST
  Action: Update
assigned_to changed from 611 to 302
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 01/05/2005 12:37 PM EST
  Comment:
Mass Update
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Final 15day GFSG Review to Initial Editor Review
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 01/05/2005 12:37 PM EST
  Attachment: P2P_author_edits.doc (469.5 KB)
  Action: Update
File added set to 532: P2P_author_edits.doc
artifact_status changed from Pending Info from Authors to Final 15day GFSG Review
resolution changed from Returned to Authors/Group to <None>
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 11/29/2004 12:34 PM EST
  Comment:
Mass Update
  Action: Update
Priority changed from 2 to 4
Greg Newby: 11/26/2004 11:35 PM EST
  Comment:
Modified document was submitted by Karen via another tracker, but was not yet ready for public comment.  I corresponded by email, and hope to get a 
revised document shortly.
  Action: Update
David De Roure: 11/22/2004 6:23 PM EST
  Comment:
In discussion with authors.

-- Dave
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 11/22/2004 5:36 PM EST
  Comment:
Thanks for this submission.  It is not quite ready for public comment, but I hope you will be able to respond to or address the following concerns, 
and submit a next iteration that will be ready for 30-day public comment.  Please use this tracker (or send email) if you have questions or concerns, 
or anything is unclear.  There are a number of comments below, some are large and some are small.  Overall, this document needs further attention from
 the author/editor to have better use of English and clearer organization.

Please send your next files in editable formats (.doc, .rtf, etc.).

Please use a spelling checker and grammar checker.  I identified a number of spelling & wording problems, but there are more.  

For authors, please consider whether to just list one or two Editors in the 1st page header, and move other contributors to a Contributor section.  Authors (or Editors) should be people with end-to-end responsibility for the document, today & for the future.

Check dates (Copyright 2002 should be 2004); make sure you have the current full copyright statement.

Spell out all acronyms on first use (OGSA).

Is OGSA truly the only focus of the RG's work?  Seems to me that the scope might be somewhat broader (i.e., any Grid-like service).

The footer should have the email of the primary author (see GFD-1).  

Section 1: check wording in "It is expected that in future ubiquitous networks that connection and interaction between devices,
systems,"

"In parallel to these developments,": you're missing the opening quotation mark for the quote in this paragraph.  "Application" is misspelled.

"Recently there have been a number of articles suggesting": why is "Peer-to-Peer" upper case here, but lower case elsewhere?  This uncertainty 
continues.  Please use one or the other (also "p2p" versus "P2P").

2.5 "Other issues"??

3. "per se" needs to be italicized (it's Latin).  "pc" should be "PC"

Under "Figure 1", you say "We describe the following use cases."  Really, though, aren't these just the linear steps in one use case?  It seems to me 
that you should talk about the steps in p2p use, rather than a separate use case for each step. This might require some wording changes elsewhere, but
 I think it would help the section to be clearer.  I have the same comment for the next section, under "Figure 2" and next under 4.b.

3.1.7: desktop client may "fail" not "fails"

3.2 why are "Users" and "System Directory" in caps?

3.3 "ref akamai" ??

"seem-less" should be "seamless"

Figures 4.a and 4.b should be 4 and 5 (number consecutively); adjust others as needed.  Refer to them with caps (i.e. 3.4.1. "Figure" not "figure")

Under 4.a: "We described de" ?

3.4.5. "groupo"

There are three tables under section 4 that make no sense to me.  They have 4.c., 4.c.1., 4.c.1, etc.  What are these?  They occur later, too.  If 
these are intended to be recommendations, please introduce them as such.  Then, they should be full sentences, not just fragments/outlines.

4.3 "optiona,"

Figure 4 (which needs to be renumbered, as mentioned) is low-resolution.  Can you make a print-ready graphic for this?  Ditto for Figure 5.

Section 7: "I don't think peer" ... huh?

Security considerations: you have two separate sections for this.  The latter can be dropped.

Author/contributor list: include a location (city/country) for each.

Glossary section "Recommended by not required."  Huh?

References 1-4 are not references.  They can just be cited in-text with a name and URL.  References are only for "documents" with persistence.  
Reference 5 needs a publication location.  I think the other references are complete.
  Action: Update
Greg Newby: 11/22/2004 5:36 PM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Initial Editor Review to Pending Info from Authors
assigned_to changed from 302 to 611
Priority changed from 5 to 2
resolution changed from <None> to Returned to Authors/Group
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 11/22/2004 12:14 PM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Initial Editor Review
assigned_to changed from 108 to 302
Priority changed from - to 5
karan bhatia: 11/20/2004 3:58 PM EST
  Action: Create

karan bhatia: 11/20/2004 3:58 PM EST
  Attachment: final-ggf-1.0.pdf (696.53 KB)
  Action: Update
File added set to 485: final-ggf-1.0.pdf

 
 
 
< Previous
 
 
Next >
 


The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/go/artf3420?nav=1 at Thu, 03 Nov 2022 16:03:30 GMT