|
Greg Newby: 05/06/2007 4:46 AM EDT
|
|
Action: |
Update
resolution changed from Accepted to none (no value)
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/18/2007 2:33 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Move
Moved from Submit OGF Draft to Published
Category changed from Recommendations Track to Community Practice
Group changed from Management to APME
resolution set to Accepted
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/18/2007 2:33 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Published.
|
|
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Joel Replogle to none (no value)
Closed set to 01/18/2007
Priority changed from 1 to 0
Status changed from Ready to Publish to Closed
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/08/2007 3:10 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
This will now be published as GFD-RP.085. Thanks to the authors/editors for efforts on this document.
|
|
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Greg Newby to Joel Replogle
Priority changed from 2 to 1
Status changed from GFSG Review: Last call to Ready to Publish
|
|
Greg Newby: 12/08/2006 11:53 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
Status changed from GFSG Review: 15-day final to GFSG Review: Last call
|
|
Greg Newby: 12/08/2006 11:40 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
The standards council approved this document. It is now in last call on the GFSG mailing list, prior to publication.
|
|
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Ellen Stokes to Greg Newby
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/26/2006 8:46 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Attached file received via email from P. Toft. This document will now go to 15-day final GFSG review.
|
|
Attachment: |
draft-ggf-cddlm-xml-cdl.doc
(485.5 KB)
|
|
Action: |
Update
Added an attachment.
Status changed from Returned to Author(s) to Final 15day GFSG Review
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/03/2006 8:03 PM EDT
|
|
Comment: |
Sent a ping to the submitter.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 06/27/2006 11:34 AM EDT
|
|
Action: |
Update
Status changed from Pending Info from Authors to Returned to Author(s)
|
|
Hiro Kishimoto: 05/27/2006 11:09 PM EDT
|
|
Comment: |
I am sorry to be late but the attached is markup file with my comments. I hope author will take care of these comments before GFD publication.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 05/26/2006 1:38 PM EDT
|
|
Comment: |
Public comment is now complete. Authors/editors, please review comments
and post here (and set the tracker back to gbn) when you
are ready to move forward.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 05/26/2006 1:38 PM EDT
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Public Comment Period to Pending Info from Authors
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 628
Priority changed from 3 to 2
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 02/12/2006 2:39 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
This will now enter 60-day public comment (most
likely after GGF16 ends), with comments due
60 days after announcement.
Authors/editors, please encourage WG members,
affiliates and others to provide public comments.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 02/12/2006 2:39 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Returned to Author(s) to Public Comment Period
assigned_to changed from 628 to 9357
Priority changed from 4 to 3
resolution changed from Returned to Authors/Group to <None>
|
|
dejan@hpl.hp.com: 02/07/2006 5:55 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Dejan accepted all changes
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Hiro Kishimoto: 01/30/2006 11:03 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Revised draft for GGF Editor submission. My comments dated 2005-08-09 are resolved and CDDLM-WG has agreed that this draft satisfies the SmartFrog
compatibility issues.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/25/2005 5:20 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Emailed Dejan to remind him of this document's
status (awaiting some changes prior to public
comment) September 25.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/06/2005 10:58 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
(Updated priority category & Assigned To for accuracy)
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/06/2005 10:58 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
assigned_to changed from 302 to 628
Priority changed from 2 to 4
|
|
Greg Newby: 08/09/2005 9:58 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_group changed from old-SRM to Management
artifact_status changed from GFSG Review to Returned to Author(s)
Priority changed from 4 to 2
resolution changed from Works For Me to Returned to Authors/Group
|
|
Greg Newby: 08/09/2005 9:48 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
The GFSG would like to see this renamed more consistently
with the "CDDLM SmartFrog-Based Language Specification,"
as well as the other comments in the tracker -- notably those
from Hiro, as well as John's comments about formatting.
Authors, would you please create a new version of this
document based on this GFSG feedback, and submit
it to the tracker? At that time, we'll go ahead with another
GFSG review (though it might be faster than the full
15 days). Thanks!
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Hiro Kishimoto: 08/09/2005 2:06 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
I read XML-CDL document and find a lot of nits. See attached file. However most of them are for readability and there is no showstopper. I think it is
ok to start public comment period.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
None: 08/08/2005 9:36 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
I see quite a bit of use of "should" and "should not", eg, "The configuration description should be declarative: it should not be a sequence of
operations...". These references however are not using the notational conventions "SHOULD" or "SHOULD NOT" (to be clear, you do have these notational
conventions also). Perhaps your use of the non-convention form accurately conveys your intention, but it may warrant a review.
Copyright date should be changed from (date) to 2005.
I recommend this document proceed.
Thanks!
John Tollefsrud
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
David Snelling: 07/26/2005 10:03 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Following Greg's request move to GSFG review
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
David Snelling: 07/26/2005 10:03 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Initial Editor Review to GFSG Review
Priority changed from 5 to 4
|
|
Greg Newby: 07/19/2005 4:52 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Thanks for these changes. I will schedule this for 15-day GFSG
review.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 07/19/2005 4:52 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Returned to Author(s) to Initial Editor Review
assigned_to changed from 133 to 302
Priority changed from 4 to 5
resolution changed from Returned to Authors/Group to Works For Me
|
|
dejan@hpl.hp.com: 07/14/2005 9:26 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Dejan has resubmitted the document with requested changes (IP moved back, changes acceted, and TOC recreated)
Question: should it be assigned to Bill Nitzberg or to Greg Newby?
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
dejan@hpl.hp.com: 07/14/2005 9:25 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Dejan has resubmitted the document with requested changes (IP moved back, changes acceted, and TOC recreated)
Question: should it be assigned to Bill Nitzberg or to Greg Newby?
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 06/26/2005 1:47 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Thanks for this submission, which I have now read. Before
presenting this to the GFSG for a 15-day review, I would
like a document with improved formatting.
Authors/editors, would you please re-submit this document with:
- all "changes" accepted in MS Word
- the copyright statement (without the GGF logo) similar to any
recently published GGF document and GFD-C.1
- regenerated/current table of contents
I did not see any problems with this document, but will take
another look before sending it for GFSG 15-day review. After
the review will be a 60 day public comment period.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 06/26/2005 1:47 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Initial Editor Review to Returned to Author(s)
assigned_to changed from 302 to 133
Priority changed from 5 to 4
resolution changed from <None> to Returned to Authors/Group
|
|
Greg Newby: 06/19/2005 9:01 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
This document is in initial editor review, and I'll get
back to you shortly with the next steps.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 06/19/2005 9:01 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Initial Editor Review
Priority changed from - to 5
|
|
|
|