|
|
|
Greg Newby: 05/06/2007 4:46 AM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Update
resolution changed from Accepted to none (no value)
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/11/2006 10:21 AM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Joel Replogle to none (no value)
Priority changed from 1 to 0
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/11/2006 10:19 AM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Move
Moved from Submit OGF Draft to Published
Category changed from Recommendations Track to Community Practice
Group changed from Data to APME
resolution set to Accepted
Status changed from ready to publish to Closed
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/03/2006 4:33 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Published as GFD-R.074. Thanks to the authors/editors for their efforts on this document.
|
| |
Attachment: |
gfd-r.074.doc
(461 KB)
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Added an attachment.
Assigned To changed from Greg Newby to Joel Replogle
Status changed from Final Editor Review to ready to publish
|
|
|
Joel Replogle: 08/29/2006 10:27 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
With support from Data AD's (Malcolm & David), this document was approved for publication, and moved into final Editor Review on 29 August, 2006.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Priority changed from 2 to 1
Status changed from Final 15day GFSG Review to Final Editor Review
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 08/15/2006 4:18 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Due to light attendance at the GFSG telecon, this
will remain open for a 7-day email list "final call"
for the GFSG. Barring concerns, it will then be
approved for a final editor check and publication.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Malcolm Atkinson to Greg Newby
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 07/31/2006 3:59 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Moved to final 15-day GFSG review, for discussion at the August 15 GFSG telecon or as soon thereafter as is feasible.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Status changed from Returned to Author(s) to Final 15day GFSG Review
|
|
|
Norman Paton: 07/23/2006 3:45 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
All three DAIS-WG specifications have just been uploaded subsequent to the changes made during public comment. The same process has been followed in
all cases:
1. A proposal was made as to the changes required from public comment (where comments were made).
2. The documents were changed directly, and all issues of substance were logged as trackers in the DAIS-WG documentt space.
3. A message was sent to the list pointing people to the trackers.
4. The issues were discussed and resolved in the list, the trackers closed, and the documents updated.
As such, if there is interest in the specific issues discussed, these can be seen through the trackers.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 05/03/2006 6:16 PM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Pending Info from Authors to Returned to Author(s)
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 05/03/2006 6:11 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Thanks, and sorry for the delay. Yes, please go ahead with
those changes. We're looking forward to the next/final
document. Work with your ADs as needed for this revision,
then upload and assign back to gbn for the next phase.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 05/03/2006 6:11 PM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Public Comment Period to Pending Info from Authors
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 465
Priority changed from 3 to 2
|
|
|
Norman Paton: 05/02/2006 7:11 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
The attached note indicates how we propose to respond to the comments made during the public comment period. At the time of writing (2nd May 2006)
the public comment period has completed but the status has not changed on Gridforge. We are keen to clarify as soon as possible how to proceed from
here, especially as GGF17 starts in just over a week.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J Beckerle: 03/22/2006 2:55 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
The issue is with the parent-sensitive to child and vice versa thing.
I expect the most common form of sensitivity is the "unknown" form i.e., where updates going on might or might not be visible within a row-set or by
way of an indirect data service. The current enums let you say that you will see them, or you won't see them, but not "you might see them".
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Berry: 02/15/2006 10:03 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Added comments in an attached Word file
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/31/2006 12:26 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Moved to public comment. This will be due 60 days
after announced. Authors/editors please seek people
to make comments.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/31/2006 12:26 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from GFSG Review to Public Comment Period
assigned_to changed from 465 to 9357
Priority changed from 4 to 3
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/09/2006 6:27 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Thanks for this submission. My initial Editor review
indicates this is ready for initial GFSG review, and
will be discussed in about 2 weeks. The next step
afterwards, assuming a positive GFSG review,
will be 60-day public comment.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/09/2006 6:27 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Open to GFSG Review
assigned_to changed from 302 to 465
Priority changed from - to 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
