05/27/2003 9:48 PM
post4186
|
2002-08-07 TELECON
Minutes of the OGSI-WG Teleconference
07/Aug/2002 @ 15:00-16:30 GMT
Minute taker: David Snelling
Attendees:
Edward Boden, IBM
Karl Czajowski, USC/ISI
Ian Foster, ANL
Andrew Grimshaw, Avaki
Fred Maciel, Hitachi
Y. Masuoka, Hitachi
Andreas Savva, Fujitsu Labs
Frank Siebenlist, ANL
David Snelling, Fujisu Labs
Steve Tuecke, ANL
Peter Vanderbilt, NASA Ames
Von Welch, ANL/UC
1) Logistics for future teleconferences
a) Teleconferences will be held on Wednesdays at 15:00 GMT.
b) Call number will be sent prior to telecon, until a permanent
one is setup
c) For the next few meetings, we will also use IRC:
DAL network Room: #OGSI
d) Normally, the IRC transcript will also be published, but this
week it was virtually empty.
Actions:
Steve Tuecke: With advice from others Steve will look into
alternatives to IRC, e.g. PlaceWare, WebX, etc.
2) Logistics for interim meeting
a) Meeting time: Sep. 4 @ 13:00 to Sep. 5 @ 15:00
b) Location: Argonne National Laboratory
c) There will be no teleconference on the Wednesday Sep. 4.
Actions:
Steve Tuecke: Steve (or secretary) will post logistics details,
maps, hotel, ... Non-US Citizens: Contact Steve ASAP to
arrange passes into Argonne.
3) New working group co-chair nomination
a) Dave Snelling has been nominated as Co-Chair to the
OGSI-WG. There have been several seconds and no other
nominations.
Actions:
Steve Tuecke: Steve to take nomination forward to GGF formally.
4) Technical Discussion of "Sameness" Issue:
a) The consensus is that "sameness" or service identity is a
service property.
b) A service MAY choose to provide mechanisms that allow a client
to test for identity, see (5-l) below.
c) Note that a client MAY choose how to interpret identity
information provided by a service.
d) Note that in the GSS, 'instance' is used freely and in many
cases carries with it an assumption of identity.
Actions:
Open: Craft words to define sameness/identity as a service property.
Open: Check 'instance' usage throughout GSS.
5) Technical Discussion of GSHs
a) GSHs MUST have the syntax of URIs.
b) The scheme of the URI determines the structure of the rest of
the URI.
c) The scheme is not required to define a protocol or process for
resolving the GSH to a GSR.
d) If a scheme puts requirements of the resolver (e.g. uniqueness
of GSHs), these SHOULD be part of the scheme specification, and
not mandated for all schemes.
e) Various schemes are specified in separate documents.
f) A service MAY have GSHs from several schemes.
g) A service MAY have more than one GSH from a given scheme,
although a given scheme MAY have more restrictions,
i.e. exactly one.
h) A service MUST have a SDE containing GSHs which refer to it.
i) This SDE MAY be empty.
j) A service MAY select, based on its policy, which GSHs are made
available to which clients, e.g. for security or access
control.
k) A service is not required to know about all GSHs that refer to
it.
l) An "Is-this-also-you(GSH)" operator SHOULD be provided by a
service. The only possible answers are "Yes" and "I don't
know".
m) A GSR MAY contain a GSH for the service.
Actions:
Open: Craft words that reflect the above.
Open: Extract the http and https scheme text separate documents.
6) Closed Issues Summary
#26 Who controls handle namespaces?
Some are controlled by the instance itself, but not
exclusively.
#27 Multiple GSHs within one URI scheme to the same instance.
Allowed, see above.
#29 Operation to check if GSH (or two) refers to an instance
Provided for, see above.
#28 Restrictions on http GSH resolver protocol
Specified in a separate...
View Full Message
|
|
|