This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/discussion/do/listPosts/projects.ggf-proc-wg/discussion.agendas_and_minutes.minutes_from_ggf12_meeting at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 06:51:17 GMT SourceForge : Post

Project Home

Tracker

Documents

Tasks

Source Code

Discussions

File Releases

Wiki

Project Admin
Project: GGF-PROC-WG     Discussion > Agendas and Minutes > Minutes from GGF12 Meeting > List of Posts
Forum Topic - Minutes from GGF12 Meeting: (1 Item)
View:  as 
 
 
Minutes from GGF12 Meeting
Chair: Cees de Laat, Tony Genovese
In attendance: Tony Genovese, Cees De Laat, Laura McGinnis, Bill Nitzberg, Dane Skow, Beth Plale, David Martin, Greg 
Newby

Notes by: David Martin

GGF Process WG
	Review notes from previous meeting

Document Review
	How do we review docs?
	It would be good to have people other than the GFSG

Document ownership
	IPR: David
	Process and Structure: Jenny
	

GGF Documents and Recommendations: Process and Requirements
GGF Structure
GGF Management Structure and Process
GGF Intellectual Property 

Beth will look at NOMCOM part of process
Governance, Group Process, IPR, GGF Management structure

Discussion: should we document GGF Chair selection process
We can't have a secret process to select chairs
Selection vs. confirmation: the NOMCOM does the selection, the GFSG provides the confirmation
How detailed do we want to be?  
Beth: Summary: Have a governance document that outlines some of this.  Do we use this doc as the starting point?

NOMCOM does GFSG selection, chair selection is different
Chair selection is on the issues list

Suggested work: we should do issues list awhile longer

Dane: two issues: need to update dormant document, GFSD3 points to process that we need to define

Bill: It doesn't matter what document content is in, as long as the content is correct.

Beth: I could look for specific NOMCOM issues

David: we could put together paragraphs and decide what docs will be created later.
Dane: We have to decide if we're going to work off issues list or document list.
Bill: I will go through process document and see if there are additional issues to add to issues list.

Bill: There is a grey area where we may want to document the best idea, not current practice.

Editor Role: we currently use IETF model, but they have more outsourcing.  We need to document the relationship between 
the GFSG and the editor role.

Dane: Do we want to enforce the IETF rule on only 5 authors.  Our current process allows unlimited authors, though the 
written one probably limits it.

Regular calls on 2nd and 4th Wednesday's right after GFSG call.

 
 


The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/discussion/do/listPosts/projects.ggf-proc-wg/discussion.agendas_and_minutes.minutes_from_ggf12_meeting at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 06:51:18 GMT