This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf6535 at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 20:52:05 GMT SourceForge : artf6535: Namespace of Relations
Home Projects Search
User Password Logins Disabled Help

Project Home
Tracker
Documents
Tasks
Source Code
Discussions
File Releases
Wiki
Project Admin
NML-WG Homepage
Search Tracker
Project: NML-WG     Trackers > Schema Progress > View Artifact
Artifact artf6535 : Namespace of Relations
Tracker: Schema Progress
Title: Namespace of Relations
Description: 
Proposal:

Use a full URI in the type of Relations.

XML:
  <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/base#isSink">

RDF:
  @prefix ex: <urn:ogf:network:example.net:2012:> .
  @prefix nml: <http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/base#>; .
  ex:myPort  nml:isSink  ex:myLink
Submitted By: Jeroen van der Ham
Submitted On: 03/14/2012 10:18 AM EDT
Last Modified: 11/30/2012 8:06 AM EST
Closed: 11/30/2012 8:06 AM EST

Status / Comments Change Log Associations Attachments  
 (13 Items)
Field Old Value New Value Date Performed By
Closed 11/30/2012 11/30/2012 8:06 AM EST Jeroen van der Ham
Status 
Last Call
 
Completed
 11/30/2012 8:06 AM EST Jeroen van der Ham
Assigned To None Jeroen van der Ham
 04/05/2012 11:44 AM EDT Jeroen van der Ham
Description 
We have no preference for XML namespacing of relation names. Roman proposes 
using namespaces for type attribute <nml:Relation nml-ext:type="hasExample">


We have no preference for XML namespacing of relation names. Roman proposes 
using namespaces for type attribute <nml:Relation nml-ext:type="hasExample">


See: https://forge.ogf.org/integration/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/201203-
schema/relation.xml?rev=20&content-type=text%2Fplain&system=exsy1001&root=nml-
examples
03/14/2012 10:52 AM EDT Jeroen van der Ham
Description 
Proposal:

Use a full URI in the type of Relations.

XML:
  <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/relation/2013/10/isSink">

RDF:
  @prefix ex: <urn:ogf:network:example.net:2012:> .
  @prefix nmlrel: <http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/relations/2013/10/>; .
  ex:myPort  nmlrel:isSink  ex:myLink

Proposal:

Use a full URI in the type of Relations.

XML:
  <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/base#isSink">;

RDF:
  @prefix ex: <urn:ogf:network:example.net:2012:> .
  @prefix nml: <http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/base#>; .
  ex:myPort  nml:isSink  ex:myLink
09/05/2012 9:36 AM EDT Freek Dijkstra
Priority 
4
 
2
 08/07/2012 6:29 PM EDT Freek Dijkstra
Status 
Need proposal
 
Last Call
 08/07/2012 6:29 PM EDT Freek Dijkstra
Category 
Procedural
 
Identifiers
 08/07/2012 6:29 PM EDT Freek Dijkstra
Description 
Proposal:

Use a full URI in the type of Relations.

XML:
  <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/relation/2016/0/isSink">

RDF:
  @prefix ex: <urn:ogf:network:example.net:2012:> .
  @prefix nmlrel: <http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/relations/2013/10/>; .
  ex:myPort  nmlrel:isSink  ex:myLink

Proposal:

Use a full URI in the type of Relations.

XML:
  <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/relation/2013/10/isSink">;

RDF:
  @prefix ex: <urn:ogf:network:example.net:2012:> .
  @prefix nmlrel: <http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/relations/2013/10/>; .
  ex:myPort  nmlrel:isSink  ex:myLink
07/11/2012 8:32 PM EDT Freek Dijkstra
Description 
We have no preference for XML namespacing of relation names. Roman proposes 
using namespaces for type attribute <nml:Relation nml-ext:type="hasExample">


See: https://forge.ogf.org/svn/repos/nml-examples/201203-schema/relation.xml
 
Proposal:

Use a full URI in the type of Relations.

XML:
  <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/relation/2016/0/isSink">;

RDF:
  @prefix ex: <urn:ogf:network:example.net:2012:> .
  @prefix nmlrel: <http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/relations/2013/10/>; .
  ex:myPort  nmlrel:isSink  ex:myLink
07/11/2012 8:32 PM EDT Freek Dijkstra
Title 
Relation and Namespaces
 
Namespace of Relations
 04/05/2012 11:51 AM EDT Freek Dijkstra
Description 
We have no preference for XML namespacing of relation names. Roman proposes 
using namespaces for type attribute <nml:Relation nml-ext:type="hasExample">


See: https://forge.ogf.org/integration/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/201203-
schema/relation.xml?rev=20&content-type=text%2Fplain&system=exsy1001&root=nml-
examples

We have no preference for XML namespacing of relation names. Roman proposes 
using namespaces for type attribute <nml:Relation nml-ext:type="hasExample">


See: https://forge.ogf.org/svn/repos/nml-examples/201203-schema/relation.xml
 04/05/2012 11:45 AM EDT Freek Dijkstra
Status 
New
 
Need proposal
 03/28/2012 10:46 AM EDT Freek Dijkstra

 
Return
 

The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf6535 at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 20:52:09 GMT