|
|
|
Freek Dijkstra: 03/29/2012 12:57 PM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Closed changed from 03/29/2012 to 03/29/2012
Status changed from Rejected to Completed
|
|
|
Jeroen van der Ham: 03/29/2012 11:06 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
We don't need a special object for it, just use "implementedBy" relation from Node to Node to define the virtualization.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Closed set to 03/29/2012
Status changed from Under discussion to Rejected
|
|
|
Freek Dijkstra: 03/28/2012 4:23 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
I propose not to pursue this issue.
It seems to me that the concept of topologies and subtopologies is more powerful, and is more relevant to the use cases of NML.
Unless you have a relevant use case that requires this concept, and can not be covered by a subtopology, I propose to close this artifcat.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Jeroen van der Ham: 09/20/2011 9:29 AM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Status changed from Waiting for volunteer to Work in Progress
|
|
|
|
|
Freek Dijkstra: 09/19/2011 9:39 PM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Priority changed from 4 to 5
|
|
|
Freek Dijkstra: 09/19/2011 9:31 PM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Category changed from Procedural to +- Device / Node / Port
|
|
|
|
