|
|
|
Greg Newby: 04/22/2012 6:41 PM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Move
Moved from Submit OGF Draft to Published
Category changed from Recommendations Track to Community Practice
Group changed from Applications to none (no value)
resolution set to Accepted
Status changed from Ready to Publish to Closed
|
|
|
Joel Replogle: 04/10/2012 3:18 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Published on 2012-04-10 as GFD.195, though used the publication date of 2012-03-12 as listed in the doc.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 04/09/2012 12:18 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Thanks, this looks good. Joel will push to ogf.org, then I will announce. Thanks for your efforts!
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Status changed from Author Action Needed to Ready to Publish
|
|
|
Andre Merzky: 04/09/2012 11:43 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
also update the document's source tarball...
|
| |
Attachment: |
ISNSpec.tar.gz
(26.9 KB)
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Added an attachment.
|
|
|
Andre Merzky: 04/09/2012 11:33 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
updated document, now with GFD number and ready to publish.
|
| |
Attachment: |
ISNSpec.pdf
(141.38 KB)
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Added an attachment.
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/27/2012 11:13 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Sent an email to the authors/editors (March 27).
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Status changed from Ready to Publish to Author Action Needed
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/12/2012 6:39 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
This is will now be published as GFD-RP.195. Thanks to authors/editors for efforts! Please provide an updated document with the final header, and
the final tarball of sources. Joel will then push it to the OGF Web site.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Daniel S. Katz to Joel Replogle
Priority changed from 2 to 1
Status changed from GFSG Review: 15-day final to Ready to Publish
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 02/28/2012 12:35 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Thanks for the further files. My understanding is this is now re-scheduled for review during the standards council at OGF
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Andre Merzky: 02/28/2012 7:50 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Also re-upload pdf
|
| |
Attachment: |
ISNSpec.pdf
(140.17 KB)
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Added an attachment.
|
|
|
Andre Merzky: 02/28/2012 7:50 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
updated version with Dan's comments applied
|
| |
Attachment: |
ISNSpec.odt
(22.2 KB)
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Added an attachment.
|
|
|
Daniel S. Katz: 02/13/2012 9:04 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
I've suggested a number of small changes and sent this back to Andre. Since these are all grammar/typo issues, full GFSC review is still probably
useful, but this will not be final version.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 02/13/2012 3:45 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Thanks for this. It is scheduled for standards council final review for February 28, or the next following telecon.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Status changed from AD Review to GFSG Review: 15-day final
|
|
|
Andre Merzky: 02/07/2012 1:14 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Status changed from Author Action Needed to AD Review
|
|
|
Andre Merzky: 02/07/2012 1:14 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Also attaching the PDF version...
|
| |
Attachment: |
ISNSpec.pdf
(140.19 KB)
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Added an attachment.
|
|
|
Andre Merzky: 02/07/2012 1:13 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Attached is (finally) the revised version of the document. It went through a final call on the mailing list, and the group is confident that it
addresses the public comments received earlier.
|
| |
Attachment: |
ISNSpec.odt
(22.21 KB)
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Added an attachment.
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/10/2012 11:18 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Per the January 9 standards telecon, Daniel will check with the group on status.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Joel Replogle: 10/10/2011 12:24 PM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Title changed from SAGA Extension: Information Service Navigatpr API to SAGA Extension: Information Service Navigator API
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 10/10/2011 12:22 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Per the standards council telecon October 10, the group is awaiting a few further comments. It will move forward after that.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 08/29/2011 1:37 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Authors/editors: public comment is complete. Please review comments in the public comment tracker. Make adjustments to your document if needed.
When ready, upload the final document to this tracker, and/or send email. It will then move to final review prior to publication.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Joel Replogle to Daniel S. Katz
Priority changed from 3 to 2
Status changed from Public Comment Period to Author Action Needed
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 05/03/2011 12:17 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
This is now approved for 60-day public comment.
Authors/editors, please solicit your constituents for comments.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Greg Newby to Joel Replogle
Priority changed from 4 to 3
Status changed from GFSG Review: Initial to Public Comment Period
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel S. Katz: 04/14/2011 11:52 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
I've reviewed this, and sent the authors a bunch of small suggested changes and enhancements. Overall, it looks good to me, subject to those changes.
I'm not sure if this should be marked "returned"?
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 04/10/2011 4:13 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Thanks. This looks good, and is initial 15-day standards council review for discussion on April 18 or May 2 or thereabouts. Next step after that
will be 60-day public comment.
We will need the editable source for this document, but not until later in the editorial process.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Greg Newby to Daniel S. Katz
Priority changed from 3 to 4
Status changed from AD Review to GFSG Review: Initial
|
|
|
|
