|
|
|
Greg Newby: 12/13/2010 12:32 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Move
Moved from Submit OGF Draft to Published
Group changed from Infrastructure to none (no value)
resolution set to Accepted
Status changed from Ready to Publish to Closed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/03/2010 5:54 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Received via email from Tom Lehman. This is now ready for publication as GFD-I.170.
Thanks to contributors for their work on this document!
|
| |
Attachment: |
draft-gwdi-nsi-idcp-2010-sep-01.doc
(951 KB)
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Added an attachment.
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 08/08/2010 3:56 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Public comment is complete. Please prepare a final version of the document (if needed), then let me know (tracker & email, please) when this is ready
for final review.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Joel Replogle to Richard Hughes-Jones
Priority changed from 3 to 2
Status changed from Public Comment Period to Author Action Needed
|
|
|
Guy Roberts: 07/30/2010 5:55 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
The following comments are from Remco Poortinga - van Wijnen, from SURFnet.
page 10:
-bullets #8, #10: wording suggests that Domain 2 sends events directly to Domain 1 and 3, while in fact it publishes events (as do Domains 1 and 3).
Suggest to reword this similar to #7: '(..) publishes a CONFIRMED event(..)'.
-'1-3 These steps are optional(..)' (bottom of page):
It is unclear from this text what determines whether path setup is triggered by message or automatically (at a specific time). Further on (section 7
.2) it becomes clear that this is determined by the 'pathSetupMode'. Suggest to make a forward reference to 7.2 to make this clearer.
page 11 (at the top):
- For the two lists (a,b,c), the c. entries are misaligned (not indented, starting at a new line).
Page 12:
The RESERVED state in the picture is referred to in the text as PENDING.
Which name is the right one?
I glimpsed over all the XML/SOAP messages (the rest of the document).
The only thing I noticed there are formatting errors (wrong font size) in 2 places:
-Page 21, start of the paragraph before the de layer2Info 'code':
'One of the <idc:layer2info> (..)' -> 'One' font too big (12 instead of 10)
-Page 32, just above 9.1.3: Also parts in Arial 12 instead of Arial 10:
/idc:createReservationResponse/idc:token
MAY be included, and contains a token that is to be used during path signaling. The specific use cases for tokens are the subject of ongoing research.
/idc:createReservationResponse/idc:status
MUST contain the value ACCEPTED to indicate the request was received and the parameters were valid.
Remco Poortinga - van Wijnen
SURFnet - Middleware Services (MWS)
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Guy Roberts: 07/29/2010 5:10 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
The NSI working group has proposed that this IDC protocol document become an OGF informational document to support the Network Services Interface
protocol.
This IDC protocol document has been prepared by the control plane group within the DICE forum. DICE is a collaboration between various research and
education network operators. The group has developed the IDCP control plane protocol for use by R&E network operators to allows dynamic creation of
international circuits. This protocol is publicly available and has not been published in any other forum. For details of the DICE IDCP group and
their work please refer to their site:
http://www.controlplane.net/
DICE members are active participants in the NSI working group and the NSI group has agreed that since the IDCP protocol forms an important reference
protocol for the developing NSI standard, we would like to publish this as an OGF informational document. We also understand that the DICE team aim
to eventually adapt their protocol to conform to the planned NSI recommendation.
We expect that one or more additional related protocols may also be published by NSI group participants as informational documents.
The NSI working group has reviewed this document and are happy to submit it in its current form.
Guy Roberts
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 05/17/2010 1:51 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
This document is ready for 30-day public comment.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Greg Newby to Joel Replogle
Priority changed from 4 to 3
Status changed from AD Review to Public Comment Period
|
|
|
|
