This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf6137?nav=1&selectedTab=associations at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:31:16 GMT SourceForge : artf6137: Are substates of lifecycle necessary?
Home Projects Search
User Password Logins Disabled Help

Project Home
Tracker
Documents
Tasks
Source Code
Discussions
File Releases
Wiki
Project Admin
Search Tracker
Project: rm-wg     Trackers > Reference Model Trackers > View Artifact
Artifact artf6137 : Are substates of lifecycle necessary?
Tracker: Reference Model Trackers
Title: Are substates of lifecycle necessary?
Description: 
Recheck the need for the substates with respect to managing asynchronous operation. E.g. can previous state do the trick
.

The assumption at present is that at least some of them are needed to support asynchronous operation of lifecycle 
management.
Submitted By: David Snelling
Submitted On: 03/06/2008 11:40 AM EST
Last Modified: 03/06/2008 11:40 AM EST

Status / Comments Change Log Associations Attachments  
Date Association Posted By Comment Association Type
No results found.

 
Return
 
 
< Previous
 
 
Next >
 

The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf6137?nav=1&selectedTab=associations at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:31:16 GMT