I would like to see the addition of the subclass definition for a BES Container that tracks the attributes as defined in
 the BES specification. 

The reason I think this is important is that (in my mind) the target audience for CIM is generally in the management 
domain (i.e. the people managing the grid infrastructure that includes the BES containers), and thus they are very 
interested in monitoring the status of the container as described by the attributes available in the 
FactoryResourceAttributesDocument. If the CIM model does not expose these attributes, then they will need to use the WS 
interface, and thus step outside of their chosen management mechanism (i.e. CIM, WBEM, WS-CIM).