Michel Drescher noted that there was an error in the schema for the WS-RF 
rendering because of an error in the included WS-BaseFaults spec.

We agreed to move to WS-RF v2 to fix the WS-BaseFaults v1 flaw.

Michel Drescher noted that there was an error in the schema for the WS-RF 
rendering because of an error in the included WS-BaseFaults spec.

"when trying to validate the WSRF rendering, I get (at least) for the Random 
ByteIO XML schema several validation errors.

The reason is that you use WSRF Base Faults verison 1 (namespace "http://docs.
oasis-open.org/wsrf/bf-1";) which has a 
schema flaw: The type wsbf:BaseFaultType contains an "xsd:any" as an extension 
point, just like many other 
specifications do as well. The problem is, however, that this :xsd"any" is 
located at the *end* of the sequence 
definition.

Now if there is another type definition in another XML Schema document that 
extends wsbf:BaseFaultType, XML Schema 
validators cannot decide anumore which elements it must validate against the 
parent type, and which against the 
inheriting type definition.

The solution is to move the WSF renderings to the followup versions of OASIS 
WSRF, i.e. "http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf
/bf-2"; and alike."

https://forge.ogf.org/sf/discussion/do/listPosts/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.
rec_byteio_wsrf_profile_1_0.oasis_wsrf_version_and_schema_va

We agreed to move to WS-RF v2 to fix the WS-BaseFaults v1 flaw.