This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf5536?nav=1&selectedTab=comments at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 14:14:15 GMT SourceForge : artf5536: EPR Namespaces
Home Projects Search
User Password Logins Disabled Help

Project Home
Tracker
Documents
Tasks
Source Code
Discussions
File Releases
Wiki
Project Admin
Search Tracker
Project: OGSA-BES Working Group     Trackers > BES V1.0 > View Artifact
Artifact artf5536 : EPR Namespaces
Tracker: BES V1.0
Title: EPR Namespaces
Description: 
[Submitted on behalf of Peter Lane]

In the third bullet under "Naming Activities: Endpoint Refereces" (and consequently in section 1.1.7), should we in fact
 be using the namespaces from the WS-Addressing and WS-Naming specs for the definitions of EndpointReferenceType instead
 of the BES-centric namespaces created solely for this spec to identify the same things? I feel like the namespaces here
 are unnecessarily arbitrary.
Submitted By: Ian Foster
Submitted On: 08/16/2006 2:41 PM EDT
Last Modified: 08/17/2006 12:00 PM EDT
Closed: 08/17/2006 12:00 PM EDT

Status / Comments Change Log Associations Attachments  
Status  
Group: *
Status:* Closed
Category: *
Customer: *
Priority: * 1
Assigned To: * None
Reported in Release: *
Fixed in Release: *
Estimated Hours: * 0
Actual Hours: * 0
Comments
Mark Morgan: 08/17/2006 12:00 PM EDT
  Comment: 
The namespaces have to be in the BES spec. namespace because they are defined by our document.
  Action: Update
Closed set to 08/17/2006
Status changed from Open to Closed
Ian Foster: 08/16/2006 2:41 PM EDT
  Action: Create


 
Return
 
 
< Previous
 
 
Next >
 

The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf5536?nav=1&selectedTab=comments at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 14:14:15 GMT