This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf5529?nav=1&selectedTab=comments at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 14:14:15 GMT SourceForge : artf5529: JSDL extensions should not be an appendix

Project Home

Tracker

Documents

Tasks

Source Code

Discussions

File Releases

Wiki

Project Admin
Search Tracker
Project: OGSA-BES Working Group     Trackers > BES V1.0 > View Artifact
Artifact artf5529 : JSDL extensions should not be an appendix
Tracker: BES V1.0
Title: JSDL extensions should not be an appendix
Description:
I disagree with moving the JSDL extension discussion to an appendix: this seems a funny half-way house for material that
 is central to the specification. I want to argue for restoring the material (probably just the first two extensions) in
 the main body. I can work on more detailed text if desired.

Submitted By: Ian Foster
Submitted On: 08/16/2006 12:10 PM EDT
Last Modified: 08/17/2006 12:14 PM EDT
Closed: 08/17/2006 12:14 PM EDT

Status / Comments Change Log Associations Attachments  
Status  
Group: *
Status:* Closed
Category: *
Customer: *
Priority: * 1
Assigned To: * None
Reported in Release: *
Fixed in Release: *
Estimated Hours: * 0
Actual Hours: * 0
Comments
Mark Morgan: 08/17/2006 12:14 PM EDT
  Comment:
We need to talk about the wrapper document that will go around the JSDL document in the create activity operation.  Things like IdempotentExecution 
should go there.  The Library Extension is clearly a JSDL extension, not a BES extension.
  Action: Update
Closed set to 08/17/2006
Status changed from Open to Closed
Ian Foster: 08/16/2006 12:10 PM EDT
  Action: Create


 
 
 
< Previous
 
 
Next >
 


The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf5529?nav=1&selectedTab=comments at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 14:14:15 GMT