SourceForge : artf5521: HPC Job Scheduling: Base Case and Common Cases

Project: Editor Trackers > Published > View Artifact

Artifact artf5521 : HPC Job Scheduling: Base Case and Common Cases

Tracker:	Published
Title:	HPC Job Scheduling: Base Case and Common Cases
Description:	This document describes the set of use cases for batch job scheduling of scientific/technical applications, also broadly referred to as the core high performance computing (HPC) use case. A simple base case is defined that we expect to have universally implemented by all batch job scheduling clients and schedulers. Additional "Common Cases" are enumerated, which are anticipated to be applicable to at least two but not all batch job scheduling clients and schedulers. This Base Case and Common Cases will be used as a set of requirements for the forthcoming GGF proposed recommendation entitled "OGSA™ HPC Profile". This document is a product of the OGSA HPC Profile WG of the Global Grid Forum.
Submitted By:	Marty Humphrey
Submitted On:	07/27/2006 2:01 PM EDT
Last Modified:	05/06/2007 4:46 AM EDT

	Status / Comments		Change Log		Associations		Attachments (2)

Status
Group: *	APME
Status:*	Closed
Category: *	Informational
Customer: *
Priority: *	0
Assigned To: *	None
Reported in Release: *
Fixed in Release: *
Estimated Hours: *	0
Actual Hours: *	0
resolution: *

Comments

Greg Newby: 05/06/2007 4:46 AM EDT
	Action:	Update Assigned To changed from Joel Replogle to none (no value) Priority changed from 1 to 0 resolution changed from Accepted to none (no value)

Greg Newby: 05/06/2007 4:45 AM EDT
	Action:	Move Moved from Submit OGF Draft to Published Group changed from Compute to APME resolution set to Accepted Status changed from Ready to Publish to Closed

Joel Replogle: 05/03/2007 3:21 PM EDT
	Comment:	Published as GFD.100 on 2007-05-03.
	Action:	Update

Greg Newby: 04/20/2007 2:21 PM EDT
	Comment:	This will now be published as GFD-I.100. Joel, would you please tend to the header/footer (also copyright & IP statement from our templates). Thanks to the editors for their work on this document.
	Action:	Update Assigned To changed from Greg Newby to Joel Replogle Status changed from Editor Review: Final to Ready to Publish

Greg Newby: 03/20/2007 10:42 AM EDT
	Comment:	The editors wish the current/last version of the document to be considered as final. This document is in final editor review prior to publication.
	Action:	Update Assigned To changed from Ramin Yahyapour to Greg Newby Priority changed from 2 to 1

Hiro Kishimoto: 03/13/2007 4:29 PM EDT

Comment:

Basically, here's the single comment:

Section 2.2:  State diagram -- This discussion neglects the "held" job state -- that is, a state where the job cannot run or is not considered to 
scheduling due to administrative/policy reasons.  This is not the same as
"queued", in that a "queued" job may be considered for scheduling whereas a "held" job is not.  This is touched on tangentially in the discussion of 
job
preemption/suspension in Section 3.8, but I would argue that "held" jobs should be considered as part of the base case.

We discussed this comment at length in one of the calls at the end of last year, and we thought it was a reasonable comment, but that the group felt
that it did not belong in the "base Case". We believe that our discussions with the implementers for the Supercomputing demo reinforced our belief 
that
it was not appropriate to have it in the base case. Note that this is explicitly dealt with in the "Extensions", so we acknowledge this issue (we
just believe that it does not belong in the base case).

So, in short, we respect this comment, and we appreciate the person taking the time to make this comment, but we don't believe that a modification to
the document is warranted. So we would request that the document as written be published as an OGF Informational Document.

Action:

Update
Status changed from Author Action Needed to Editor Review: Final

Greg Newby: 12/08/2006 3:59 AM EST
	Comment:	Sent a notice to the authors that this document is awaiting their response.
	Action:	Update

Greg Newby: 10/24/2006 10:45 AM EDT
	Action:	Update Priority changed from 3 to 2

Greg Newby: 10/24/2006 10:44 AM EDT

Comment:

Public comment is complete.  Authors/editors, please review comments, and make any changes to a new document.  Upload that new document (if needed) 
here, and set the trackekr back to Greg Newby.  The next phase for this document will be a final Editor review.

Action:

Update
Assigned To changed from Joel Replogle to Ramin Yahyapour
resolution changed from Accepted to none (no value)
Status changed from Public Comment Period to Returned to Author(s)

Greg Newby: 09/03/2006 7:40 PM EDT
	Comment:	The public comment link: https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/discussion/do/listTopics/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.info_hpc_job_scheduling_use_case Public comment period will end on September 20.
	Action:	Update

Greg Newby: 08/15/2006 10:41 AM EDT
	Comment:	This document looks good, and will now be moved to 30-day public comment. I made slight updates to replace "GGF" with "OGF," but no other changes.
	Attachment:	draft-ggf-ogsa-hpcp-use-cases-02.doc (143.5 KB)
	Action:	Update Added an attachment. Assigned To changed from Greg Newby to Joel Replogle Priority changed from 5 to 3 Status changed from Initial Editor Review to Public Comment Period

Greg Newby: 07/31/2006 3:38 AM EDT
	Comment:	This is now in initial editor review.
	Action:	Update Assigned To set to Greg Newby Priority changed from 4 to 5 Status changed from AD Review to Initial Editor Review

Marty Humphrey: 07/27/2006 2:01 PM EDT
	Attachment:	draft-ggf-ogsa-hpcp-use-cases-01.doc (146 KB)
	Action:	Create Added an attachment.

Return

< Previous

Next >