Description: |
[From ogsa-wg mailing list; see url]
Hi Kojo-san,
Thank you very much for your kind offer.
Your contribution is the most welcome!
I would like to ask you to write up;
(1) high level service description of deployment service for section 4.4 of
the OGSA doc.
(2) two or three page description of the service for section 6.10. You
should use existing
template below.
https://forge.gridforum.org/docman2/ViewProperties.php?group_id=42&category_id=357&document_content_id=708
Andreas: Please create new item"deployment service description" in the
tracker.
Kojo-san: Please create user-id for GridForge.
----
Hiro Kishimoto
----- Original Message -----
From: "Takashi Kojo" <tkojo@mvi.biglobe.ne.jp>
To: "Milojicic, Dejan" <dejan@exch.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <nakata@ccm.cl.nec.co.jp>; <cddlm-wg@ggf.org>;
<i.j.taylor@cs.cardiff.ac.uk>; "Goldsack, Patrick"
<Patrick_Goldsack@hplb.hpl.hp.com>; "Toft, Peter" <Peter.Toft@hp.com>;
"'Inder Monga'" <imonga@nortelnetworks.com>;
<hiro.kishimoto@jp.fujitsu.com>; <fred-m@crl.hitachi.co.jp>;
<sschaefer@softricity.com>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 7:24 AM
Subject: Positioning CDDLM into OGSA
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As a part of early discussion of how we would proceed this WG,
>> Dejan and I talked about how we can position ourselves into OGSA.
>> We both believe this is important issue to the group. I think this effort
>> would be proceeded in parallel with main stream discussion of CODDLE.
>>
>> According to OGSA presentation in ggf9, the WG defined their
>> OGSA branding criteria. Literal meaning of this list is conditions
>> for bringing up something like "OGSA-Deployment", but from our
>> prospective, the list can be regarded as their condition for positioning
>> CDDLM specification into OGSA.
>>
>> 1.- Operating within the OGSI framework.
>> 2.- The work fit into the Architecture as defined by the OGSA doc
>> 3.- Engage actively with us and other OGSA related WG
>> 4.- Use OGSA as an adjective.
>>
>> I think #1 will be satisfied by our future specification.
>> #2 and #3 seems to require a kind of liaison effort from our side.
>> Hiro could be a candidate for the role for the strong involvement
>> in the both WG. But being co-chair of OGSA, he is supposed to be
>> neutral to any WG. So, if it is OK with you all, I would be volunteering
>> the role. I guess I can take advantage geographically close to Hiro.
>>
>>
>> Kojo
>>
>>
. |