This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf5293?nav=1&selectedTab=comments at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 09:03:09 GMT SourceForge : artf5293: (1228) Number scheme for Requirements/Extensibility points

Project Home

Tracker

Documents

Tasks

Source Code

Discussions

File Releases

Wiki

Project Admin

Glance

Calendar
Search Tracker
Project: OGSA-WG     Trackers > WSRF Basic Profile > View Artifact
Artifact artf5293 : (1228) Number scheme for Requirements/Extensibility points
Tracker: WSRF Basic Profile
Title: (1228) Number scheme for Requirements/Extensibility points
Description:
What numbering scheme should we use for requirements and extensibility points? sequential? structured?.
Submitted By: Tom Maguire
Submitted On: 01/28/2005 1:54 PM EST
Last Modified: 06/30/2008 10:48 PM EDT
Closed: 06/20/2005 10:44 AM EST

Status / Comments Change Log Associations Attachments  
Status  
Group: *
Status:* Closed
Category: * Version 1.0
Customer: *
Priority: * 3
Assigned To: * Tom Maguire
Reported in Release: *
Fixed in Release: *
Estimated Hours: * 0
Actual Hours: * 0
Comments
Andreas Savva: 06/30/2008 10:48 PM EDT
  Comment:
Assigned category due to minor expected tweaks as a result of the experience document
  Action: Update
Category set to Version 1.0
Andreas Savva: 06/20/2005 10:44 AM EST
  Comment:
Confirmed in draft 18 (gridforge draft 12).

Note that there is a gap in section 8. Missing R0815
  Action: Update
Andreas Savva: 06/20/2005 10:44 AM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Fixed to Closed
close_date changed from - to 2005-06-21 00:44:37
Tom Maguire: 06/13/2005 8:02 AM EST
  Comment:
numbering rule used in v018

extensibility numbering rule xx0y where x=section (03,04,etc), 
0
y=monotonic increasing integer

requirement numbering rule xxyy where xx=section (03,04,etc)
yy=monotonic increasing integer where yy>10
  Action: Update
Tom Maguire: 06/13/2005 8:02 AM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Resolved to Fixed
Andreas Savva: 06/13/2005 5:59 AM EST
  Comment:
Referring to (gridforge) draft 18  the numbering is still inconsistent. 
E.g., R0311 in section 3.1.1. should really be R0302. Also the targets in section 4 are inconsistent since they start form R0411.

Is a different rule being applied?
  Action: Update
Andreas Savva: 06/13/2005 5:59 AM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Fixed to Resolved
Tom Maguire: 04/20/2005 3:01 PM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Resolved to Fixed
Tom Maguire: 03/02/2005 8:43 PM EST
  Comment:
number xxyy where xx=section number, yy = montonic increasing number
  Action: Update
Tom Maguire: 03/02/2005 8:43 PM EST
  Action: Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Resolved
assigned_to changed from 100 to 191
Tom Maguire: 02/14/2005 10:58 AM EST
  Action: Update
Priority changed from - to 3
Tom Maguire: 01/28/2005 1:54 PM EST
  Action: Create


 
 
 
< Previous
 
 
Next >
 


The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/sfmain/do/go/artf5293?nav=1&selectedTab=comments at Sun, 06 Nov 2022 09:03:09 GMT