Mass Update

Thanks for the new file (received by email; uploaded
to this tracker).  This document is now in 30-day public
comment, and will be due 30 days after publicly announced.

Response received from Arun.  This is
still in process...

Note that I got a response in May, and sent another
followup on June 26.  The author is reviewing edits
and seeking consensus in the group.

Sorry for my long delay in providing an initial editor review of this document.  I have a few changes to request, before putting this into 30-day 
public comment.  Overall, I think this document is quite good, and will be a valuable addition to the GGF document series.

If you could address these concerns and upload a revised document, we will go ahead and put it into 30-day public comment.

- The first page doesn't meet the guideline from our sample template document & GFD-1.  Please remove the logo and add author (or editor) information
- Similarly, the running header needs to be adjusted
- You have a "Glossary TBD" section.  This either needs to be included, as a document under public comment then final editorial review, or removed.  
There is no requirement for a glossary, though a glossary is nice to include if you would ilke to.
- In your References section, none of the listed items appear to be references to static documents.  URLs should be cited in-line (that is, within the
 text), not listed in references.  References have authors, and publication locations, and refer to static ongoing documents such that a future reader
 (i.e., in 5 years) could see the same document you saw in writing your document.  The Blackboard Picture *might* be to a static document, but it's 
just a URL for a JPG.  If you refer to a document, it would be a reference rather than an inline citation.  
- There are some "highlight changes" still present in the .doc file, which should be accepted or otherwise adjusted

These are all fairly minor editorial/formatting changes, which should not take too long to address.  I hope you will be able to fix them and get a 
revised document submitted to the Gridforge tracker.

The good news is that I did not see any important changes to make to the language and content of the document.  We will look to the public comment 
period as an opportunity for further technical review and comment, as well as to get confirmation from WG members that they have read & agree to the 
document.

Thanks for your submission.  This document is now in initial editor review.  After any feedback, the next step will be 30-day public comment.