Published as GFD.66 on 27 March, 2006

Ok.  I'll give this a final review, then move
to the next phase.

This document captures use of technology can be labelled "historical". While it didn't get through publication in a timely manner for several reasons,
 it has been exposed to implementation experiecen and updated to capture feedback from those efforts: It is my opionion that the document is 
technically in a very good state.

Given the good technical content and the slight historical status, I do not find a lack of public comments a major concern. After discussions with the
 authors and the WG, we therefore propose to move this document onwards in the publication process but to publish it as an Experimental document.

/Olle

There were zero comments in the public comment tracker:
https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=576

I'm re-assigning this to one of the cognizant area directors,
to plan the next phase.  Typically, we would start another
60-day public comment, but maybe there are reasons to just
go ahead and accept this document as-is.

This document is now in 60-day public comment,
and will be due 60 days after it is publicly announced.

The GFSG noted that OGSI is a "legacy" base for
the recommendation, compared to WS-.  In the future,
we anticipate a follow-on or replacement document.

One related suggestion is to consider changing the title of
the document.

To respond to Dave Snelling's remark, yes the plan is to update this document to WSRF. However there were multiple implementors (Globus and PERMIS) 
who implemented this OGSI-based specification and it was used in deployment (UK BRIDGES project). Hence from our perspective it seems worth capturing.

This document is now in 15-day GFSG review,
prior to public comment.  Because of the intervening
GGF15 conference, responses from GFSG will be
due one week later: October 18.

Note, I uploaded a copy of this document with
all changes accepted, for the GSFG review.

Dear Author or Draft Editor-

Thank you for submitting your draft to the GGF Editor!  In most cases the draft 
will be assigned to an Area Director for review as the first step in the document 
publication process.

The URL provided with this note allows you to track your submission and to 
communicate with the GGF Editor or Area Director(s) who are reviewing the 
draft.  At the very bottom of the tracker display (web page) a detailed log of all 
actions related to this submission is available.

You may also wish to alert your colleagues that the draft has been submitted, and from their GridForge accounts they may wish to monitor this item in 
order to receive email any time action is taken regarding this submission.

Informational and Experimental drafts are reviewed by the GGF Editor and one 
or more Area Directors.  The GGF Editor will determine whether the draft is 
ready for public comment, or if there are items for the author(s) to address 
prior to public comment.  This initial review generally takes no more than two 
weeks.

Community Practice and Recommendations Track drafts require a GFSG review 
prior to public comment.  This can add 2-3 weeks to the initial GGF Editor 
review depending on current workload of the GFSG.

Please do not hesitate to inquire about the status of your submission at any time by way of comments added to this tracker item, which will be 
automatically emailed to the individual who appears in the "assigned to" field.

Thanks very much- 
GGF Editor