This will now be published as GFD-RP.099.  Thanks to
the authors/editors for work on this document!

OOOPS It was core that was already published. Back into 15 day status. I should let Greg always do this.

Thanks for this revised document.  It will now go
to final 15-day GFSG review, prior to publication.

Email received that the next version of this document is forthcoming within a week or so.

Couple comments-

1) The document references the "Basic-Security-Profile" in section 3.2.1. I was confused at first as to whether this was the OGSA BSP or the WS-I BSP.
 I suggest this usage include the full title of the document being referenced.

2) I find it slighly bothersome that the WS-I BSP only discourages use of ciphersuites that don't provide confidentiality (section 4.2.3). Since this 
document builds on WS-I BSP I don't see how it can "ensure confidentiallity" (section 1.1) unless it constrains the use of WS-I BSP to prohibit the 
discouraged ciphersuites.

Per the GFSG April 11 conference call, this will
be advanced to 60-day public comment.

Thanks for fixing this.  We'll go ahead with
GFSG 15-day initial review, prior to public
comment.  This will be discussed on April 11,
or as soon after as possible, along with the
companion Core document.

Revised document which can be opened by Mac OSX.

Sorry, but this document's file would not open
for me either.  I was able to read the main text,
but MS Word would not open the file.

Please let me know when you get a replacement
file uploaded, and they'll go into GFSG review 
immediately.

Dear Author or Draft Editor-

Thank you for submitting your draft to the GGF Editor!  In most cases the draft 
will be assigned to an Area Director for review as the first step in the document 
publication process.

The URL provided with this note allows you to track your submission and to 
communicate with the GGF Editor or Area Director(s) who are reviewing the 
draft.  At the very bottom of the tracker display (web page) a detailed log of all 
actions related to this submission is available.

You may also wish to alert your colleagues that the draft has been submitted, and from their GridForge accounts they may wish to monitor this item in 
order to receive email any time action is taken regarding this submission.

Informational and Experimental drafts are reviewed by the GGF Editor and one 
or more Area Directors.  The GGF Editor will determine whether the draft is 
ready for public comment, or if there are items for the author(s) to address 
prior to public comment.  This initial review generally takes no more than two 
weeks.

Community Practice and Recommendations Track drafts require a GFSG review 
prior to public comment.  This can add 2-3 weeks to the initial GGF Editor 
review depending on current workload of the GFSG.

Please do not hesitate to inquire about the status of your submission at any time by way of comments added to this tracker item, which will be 
automatically emailed to the individual who appears in the "assigned to" field.

Thanks very much- 
GGF Editor