This will now be published as GFD-RP.087.  Thanks to the authors/editors for work on this document.

The standards council approved this document.  It is now in last call on the GFSG mailing list, prior to publication.

The attached file was received by email from M. Drescher.  This will now go to final GFSG review.

Authors/editors: Please review public comments, and
if necessary submit a revised document to this tracker.
Work with your area director as needed for guidance.
When you are ready to advance this document to the
next step, assign the tracker back to gbn.  Thanks!

The public comment tracker item:
https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=590

Sorry for not reviewing this sooner.  This apppears to
be a well-written document, and addresses a key
area of importance for Grid computing.

This will go to initial 15-day GFSG review prior to entering
60-day public comment.   Due to holidays, it might take
an extra week or so for approval.

I have one required change, which is that several
of your references are not references.  References must
refer to static documents, such that readers can find 
the same thing you used in writing your recommendation.
Things like Web sites and standards groups should not
appear in references, but should instead be cited 
in-text.  If you want to add an appendix or other section
listing relevant online resources, that's OK...but references
need to be static documents (it's OK if they're electronic
only, as long as they can be described unambiguously).

I noted that this relies on the schemas.ggf.org site setup.  I
suspect this is realistic, and we should know by the end
of public comment.

Dear Author or Draft Editor-

Thank you for submitting your draft to the GGF Editor!  In most cases the draft 
will be assigned to an Area Director for review as the first step in the document 
publication process.

The URL provided with this note allows you to track your submission and to 
communicate with the GGF Editor or Area Director(s) who are reviewing the 
draft.  At the very bottom of the tracker display (web page) a detailed log of all 
actions related to this submission is available.

You may also wish to alert your colleagues that the draft has been submitted, and from their GridForge accounts they may wish to monitor this item in 
order to receive email any time action is taken regarding this submission.

Informational and Experimental drafts are reviewed by the GGF Editor and one 
or more Area Directors.  The GGF Editor will determine whether the draft is 
ready for public comment, or if there are items for the author(s) to address 
prior to public comment.  This initial review generally takes no more than two 
weeks.

Community Practice and Recommendations Track drafts require a GFSG review 
prior to public comment.  This can add 2-3 weeks to the initial GGF Editor 
review depending on current workload of the GFSG.

Please do not hesitate to inquire about the status of your submission at any time by way of comments added to this tracker item, which will be 
automatically emailed to the individual who appears in the "assigned to" field.

Thanks very much- 
GGF Editor