|
|
|
Greg Newby: 04/20/2007 2:25 PM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Greg Newby to none (no value)
Priority changed from 1 to 0
resolution changed from Accepted to none (no value)
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 04/20/2007 2:24 PM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Move
Moved from Submit OGF Draft to Published
Category changed from Recommendations Track to Community Practice
Group changed from Management to APME
resolution set to Accepted
Status changed from Ready to Publish to Closed
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 04/20/2007 2:23 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Published as GFD-R.098, actually.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 04/20/2007 2:22 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Published as GFD-R.099.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
David Snelling: 04/05/2007 8:39 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Last call completed withont issues. Ready to publish.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Status changed from GFSG Review: Last call to Ready to Publish
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/20/2007 11:00 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
The standards council discussed this during the March 20 telecon, and confirmed its readiness for publication. It is now in final 7-day mailing list
last call.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Status changed from GFSG Review: 15-day final to GFSG Review: Last call
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/20/2007 10:53 AM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Category changed from Community Practice to Recommendations Track
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/04/2007 6:00 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Assigned To set to Hiro Kishimoto
Group changed from Applications to Management
Priority changed from 0 to 1
resolution changed from Accepted to none (no value)
Status changed from AD Review to GFSG Review: 15-day final
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/04/2007 5:55 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
This document didn't get its 15-day GFSG review (gbn's error). Reinserting to the GFSG for comment, due March 20.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 02/26/2007 1:45 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Joel Replogle to none (no value)
Priority changed from 1 to 0
Status changed from Closed to PUBLISHED
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 02/26/2007 1:44 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Move
Moved from Submit OGF Draft to Published
Category changed from Recommendations Track to Community Practice
Group changed from Management to APME
resolution set to Accepted
Status changed from Ready to Publish to Closed
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 02/13/2007 2:27 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
This will now be published as GFD-RP.098.
Thanks to the authors/editors for work on this document!
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Hiro Kishimoto to Joel Replogle
Priority changed from 2 to 1
Status changed from Editor Review: Final to Ready to Publish
|
|
|
Hiro Kishimoto: 01/30/2007 11:32 AM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Status changed from Author Action Needed to Editor Review: Final
|
|
|
Hiro Kishimoto: 01/30/2007 11:31 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
With the support of Laura McGinnis (co-chair), Donal Fellows, and Stephen Pickles, I will re-submit WG-last-called version to OGF Editor.
|
| |
Attachment: |
UR-Spec-gfd.58-ggf18.doc
(649 KB)
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Added an attachment.
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 12/08/2006 3:43 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
sent another ping to the authors.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/21/2006 3:20 PM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Status changed from Pending Info from Authors to Returned to Author(s)
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/03/2006 7:57 PM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Sent a ping to the submitter.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 06/27/2006 11:18 AM EDT
|
| |
Comment: |
Status should have been 2, not 4, after public comment.
Otherwise, progress on this document is pending action by the authors/editors to respond to public comments.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Priority changed from 4 to 2
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/26/2006 7:18 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Public comment is complete.
Authors, please respond to the public comments in the
public comment tracker (URL is below) or this tracker.
If needed, upload a new document and re-assign
to gbn for bringing to the next phase.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/26/2006 7:18 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Public Comment Period to Pending Info from Authors
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 155
Priority changed from 3 to 4
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/19/2006 2:56 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Sorry for my misinformation...this won't
be done with public comment until about February 10.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/19/2006 2:56 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Returned to Author(s) to Public Comment Period
assigned_to changed from 628 to 9357
Priority changed from 2 to 3
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/09/2006 5:22 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Authors, please respond to the public comments either
in that tracker, or this one. If you have a further draft,
please upload it here.
Please indicate in this tracker when you are ready to put
the document into the next phase (GFSG review).
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/09/2006 5:22 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Public Comment Period to Returned to Author(s)
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 628
Priority changed from 3 to 2
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/22/2005 11:13 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Sorry for not following through on this earlier.
This document is now in 60-day public comment,
and will be due 60 days after it is publicly announced.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/22/2005 11:13 AM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from GFSG Review to Public Comment Period
assigned_to changed from 628 to 9357
Priority changed from 4 to 3
|
|
|
John Tollefsrud: 11/22/2005 1:50 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
I've reviewed this document and recommend it proceed to public comment. Andre's comments should be addressed by the document authors as part of the
public comment process.
Thanks -
jt
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Andre Merzky: 11/21/2005 7:33 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
The 'status' field is supposed to be numeric, but the individual valies are not defined (completed = 1, pending = 2 etc). Also the example seems to
use a string (completed). Do I miss something?
Andre.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Andre Merzky: 11/21/2005 7:33 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
The 'status' field is supposed to be numeric, but the individual valies are not defined (completed = 1, pending = 2 etc). Also the example seems to
use a string (completed). Do I miss something?
Andre.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/21/2005 6:53 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
This document's status was not updated, and
might not have been discussed - sorry for not
following up sooner. I have re-scheduled it for
the next GFSG conference call.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 10/02/2005 3:03 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
assigned_to changed from 229 to 628
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 10/01/2005 2:36 AM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Open to GFSG Review
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 10/01/2005 2:34 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Thanks for this submission. I have reviewed it,
and believe it is well-written and nicely formatted.
This will go to 15-day GFSG review, though due
to the GGF conference will be due one week later,
on October 25.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 10/01/2005 2:34 AM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
assigned_to changed from 302 to 229
Priority changed from - to 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
