Under discussion

Completed

service object also uses type attribute, RDF uses:
"nmlserv:Switchingtype rdfs:subClassOf nml:Service ."

something to consider when we do translation between the two.

NML currently defines three services: AdaptationService, DeadaptationService and
 SwitchingService.

Proposal for syntax in RDF:

  @prefix  nml:  <http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/base#">;
  urn:ogf:...:myservice     a                   nml:SwitchingService  .

Proposal for syntax in XML:

  <nml:SwitchingService id="...">


Alternative RDF and XML syntax:

  @prefix  nml:  <http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/base#">;
  urn:ogf:...:myservice     a                   nml:SwitchingService  .
  nml:SwitchingService      rdfs:isSubclassOf   nml:Service  .

  <nml:Service type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/base#SwitchingService"; 
id="...">

Rationale for this proposal: because of the very different relations associated 
with a AdaptationService and a SwitchingService (and later perhaps a tunable 
label service), the different services are described in a different way in the 
document. This is slightly easier to write (e.g. "a Switching Service" instead 
of a "Service of type SwitchingService"), so I thought it would be OK to use the
 same separation in the XML and RDF syntax.

New

Under discussion