Was going through the changes and noticed that for this change (enum change for testNumberRepresentation from "text" to 
"standard") that we now have a few inconsistencies in the spec.  Minor stuff, but could confuse:


1. There is still a reference to the old enum of "text" is an example 7.8.1 
                            textNumberRepresentation=”text" 
 
 
 
 2. Also section 15.5 there is a series of typos:
 
  "Signed numbers with binaryNumberRep 'packed' are mapped using sign nibble to indicate the sign. The unsigned nibble 
is treated as positive. On unparsing the sign nibble is written according to dfdl: binaryPackedSignCodes. The unsigned 
nibble is never used.
 Signed numbers with textNumberRepresentation 'bcd' are always positive. On parsing it is a processing error is the data
 is negative.
 Unsigned numbers with textNumberRepresentation 'packed' are mapped if the nibble is positive or unsigned. It is a 
processing error if the data is negative. On unparsing the unsigned nibble is used
 Unsigned numbers with textNumberRepresentation 'bcd' are mapped as the data is positive"
 
 These should all be binaryNumberRep