SourceForge : artf6311: Relying Party Defined Namespace Constraints Policies in a Policy Bridge PKI Environment

Project: Editor Trackers > Published > View Artifact

Artifact artf6311 : Relying Party Defined Namespace Constraints Policies in a Policy Bridge PKI Environment

Tracker:	Published
Title:	Relying Party Defined Namespace Constraints Policies in a Policy Bridge PKI Environment
Description:	Relying Party Defined Namespace Constraints (RPDNC) are limitations on the subject namespace issued by X.509 certification authorities (CAs) that are defined and enforced by the end-point at the relying party side. As grid authentication based on X.509 credentials provides the subject DN as a handle that identifies the authenticated entity, the capability to ensure subject name uniqueness is of critical importance in ensuring overall integrity of the authentication system. This document described the rationale and use cases for relying party defined name space constraints, and lists the set of desired features a policy language expressing such constraints should have.
Submitted By:	David Groep
Submitted On:	05/28/2009 8:21 PM EDT
Last Modified:	07/14/2011 4:28 PM EDT

	Status / Comments		Change Log		Associations		Attachments (2)

Status
Group: *
Status:*	Closed
Category: *	Informational
Customer: *
Priority: *	1
Assigned To: *	Joel Replogle
Reported in Release: *
Fixed in Release: *
Estimated Hours: *	0
Actual Hours: *	0
resolution: *	Accepted

Comments

Greg Newby: 07/14/2011 4:28 PM EDT
	Action:	Move Moved from Submit OGF Draft to Published Group changed from Security to none (no value) resolution set to Accepted Status changed from Ready to Publish to Closed

Greg Newby: 05/03/2011 12:35 PM EDT
	Action:	Update Assigned To changed from Jens Jensen to Joel Replogle Priority changed from 2 to 1

Greg Newby: 05/03/2011 12:33 PM EDT
	Comment:	Thanks. This is now published as GFD-I.189. Thanks to the authors/editors for their efforts!
	Action:	Update

Jens Jensen: 05/03/2011 12:21 PM EDT
	Comment:	Attached the most recent version (June 2010).
	Attachment:	draft-ogf-caops-rpdnc-20100622.doc (215 KB)
	Action:	Update Added an attachment. Status changed from Author Action Needed to Ready to Publish

Greg Newby: 03/20/2011 3:28 AM EDT
	Comment:	Jens will ask to get the most recent version. Then, it will be ready for standards council final review.
	Action:	Update

Greg Newby: 03/10/2011 6:52 PM EST
	Comment:	Thanks for this. Once the final version is ready, upload here or send an email.
	Action:	Update

Jens Jensen: 03/07/2011 1:05 PM EST
	Comment:	CAOPS has now signed this off. The AD recommended writing (or communicating) a response to the reviewer but this can now happen independently.
	Action:	Update

Greg Newby: 11/22/2010 11:31 AM EST
	Comment:	Status from OGF: Jens will speak with group. Document is almost finished
	Action:	Update

Greg Newby: 03/31/2010 1:40 PM EDT

Comment:

Update received from the AD:

"There was a document status review on the agenda for CAOPS; I just
don't have a writeup
from the chairs yet.

Things have happened behind the scenes: the response to the public
comments was discussed
at a previous OGF - I can't remember which one - but the authors still
need to address the remaining
comments and are aware of it.  One of the authors has the pen  The
document and how to proceed
with it was discussed and agreed at OGF28."

Action:

Update

Greg Newby: 03/30/2010 4:46 PM EDT
	Comment:	The standards council will discuss next steps for this document, since we have have not heard here from the authors/editors.
	Action:	Update

Greg Newby: 10/12/2009 11:50 AM EDT
	Comment:	This document was discussed by the steering council at OGF27. The AD (Jensen) will follow up with the group to assess status.
	Action:	Update Assigned To changed from Chris Smith to Jens Jensen

Greg Newby: 07/22/2009 2:51 PM EDT

Comment:

Public comment is complete.  Authors/editors, please review comments here:
  http://www.ogf.org/gf/docs/comment.php?id=298
If further changes are needed, go ahead with an updated
document.

When ready to proceed, indicate it in this tracker, or via email.  Thanks.

Because the area directors for Security are both authors on this document, I have asked the VP Standards to fulfill the AD role.

Action:

Update
Assigned To changed from Joel Replogle to Chris Smith
Priority changed from 3 to 2
Status changed from Public Comment Period to Author Action Needed

Joel Replogle: 06/03/2009 11:12 AM EDT
	Comment:	Entered 30-day public comment and available on the OGF website on 2009-06-03.
	Action:	Update

Greg Newby: 05/29/2009 9:18 PM EDT
	Comment:	Thanks, this looks good. It's headed for 30-day public comment. Please solicit readers to provide public comment, as an indicator of community support.
	Action:	Update Assigned To changed from Greg Newby to Joel Replogle Priority changed from 4 to 3 resolution changed from Accepted to none (no value) Status changed from Editor Review: Initial to Public Comment Period

David Groep: 05/28/2009 8:24 PM EDT

Comment:

Dear Greg: 

This document was accepted after final call in the CAOPS-WG, and completed and endorsed in the CAOPS sessions in OGF26. 

I've put it in with the blessing from Christos and Yoshio, and from Jens, obviously, and I think it's ready for the next step.

  Thanks,
  DavidG.

Action:

Update
Assigned To changed from David Groep to Greg Newby
Status changed from AD Review to Editor Review: Initial

David Groep: 05/28/2009 8:21 PM EDT
	Attachment:	draft-ogf-caops-rpdnc-editor-1.doc (110.5 KB)
	Action:	Create Added an attachment.

Return

< Previous

Next >