SourceForge : artf5806: general

Project: saga-core-wg Trackers > Core API: public comments > View Artifact

Artifact artf5806 : general

Tracker:	Core API: public comments
Title:	general
Description:	- class names could be shorter (name_space_file -> ns_file etc.) As an OO software architect I would strongly argue against it and rather request the opposite. The name of a package, class, method variable, constant, etc should be self explanatory. Shorten it won't help, also do not assume that every one knows the short hands for namespace -> ns.
Submitted By:	Andre Merzky
Submitted On:	02/21/2007 10:49 AM EST
Last Modified:	02/24/2007 7:16 PM EST
Closed:	02/24/2007 7:16 PM EST

	Status / Comments		Change Log		Associations		Attachments

Status
Group: *
Status:*	Closed
Category: *
Customer: *
Priority: *	3
Assigned To: *	None
Reported in Release: *
Fixed in Release: *
Estimated Hours: *	0
Actual Hours: *	0

Comments

Andre Merzky: 02/24/2007 7:16 PM EST
	Comment:	Declined: after discussion we agreed that class names should be verbose, but language bindings can deviate - the spec allows that already.
	Action:	Update Closed set to 02/24/2007 Status changed from Open to Closed

Andre Merzky: 02/21/2007 10:50 AM EST
	Action:	Update Priority changed from 4 to 3

Andre Merzky: 02/21/2007 10:50 AM EST

Action:

Update
Description changed from

 - class names could be shorter (name_space_file -> ns_file etc.)

 - class names could be shorter (name_space_file -> ns_file etc.)

As an OO software architect I would strongly argue against it and rather request the opposite. The name of a package, 
class, method variable, constant, etc should be self explanatory. Shorten it won't help, also do not assume that every 
one knows the short hands for namespace -> ns.

Andre Merzky: 02/21/2007 10:49 AM EST
	Action:	Create

Return

< Previous

Next >