SourceForge : artf5732: general

Project: saga-core-wg Trackers > Core API: public comments > View Artifact

Artifact artf5732 : general

Tracker:	Core API: public comments
Title:	general
Description:	page 31: for objects implementing the error_handler interface: comment: is this really the best solution. Isn't it better to have explicit clear() method, in this way you can execute a batch of operations / call on the object, and just check for any error at the end. This way of programming is much more in use than checking for errors after each call.
Submitted By:	Andre Merzky
Submitted On:	02/21/2007 10:33 AM EST
Last Modified:	02/24/2007 7:21 PM EST
Closed:	02/24/2007 7:21 PM EST

	Status / Comments		Change Log		Associations		Attachments

Status
Group: *
Status:*	Closed
Category: *
Customer: *
Priority: *	3
Assigned To: *	None
Reported in Release: *
Fixed in Release: *
Estimated Hours: *	0
Actual Hours: *	0

Comments

Andre Merzky: 02/24/2007 7:21 PM EST

Comment:

Declined: This was discussed at OGF19, and the group felt that this scheme would (a) be unexpected to the user (we found no other API implementing 
this scheme), and (b) would make it impossible to learn which method invokation caused the error, and would hence make error reporting close to 
useless.

Action:

Update
Closed set to 02/24/2007
Status changed from Open to Closed

Andre Merzky: 02/21/2007 10:51 AM EST
	Action:	Update Priority changed from 4 to 3

Andre Merzky: 02/21/2007 10:33 AM EST
	Action:	Create

Return

< Previous

Next >