SourceForge : artf5595: Issues from Andreas

Project: OGSA-NAMING-WG Trackers > Naming Comments by Frank > View Artifact

Artifact artf5595 : Issues from Andreas

Tracker:	Naming Comments by Frank
Title:	Issues from Andreas
Description:	Andreas contributed these via email: [I would have put these in a tracker but I wasn't sure which one.] 1. Since the document defines profiles according to GFD.59 it should reference it. Also the document should follow profile conventions by listing and numbering the extensibility points and compliance statements. I think GFD.72 is a good example to follow. 2. The Introduction starting with "WS-Naming is built in four parts" needs updating due to the section re-organization at GGF18. 3. Some statements in the profile sub-sections are not appropriate. For example, in section 4.1 "INSTANCEs conforming to WS-Naming MAY conform to the Endpoint Identifier Profile." is really a meta-statement about the way that the different profiles may be combined. (I think Tom also mentioned something like this at GGF18 but it wasn't discussed further.) So how about moving such statements to a separate section, e.g. "Profile Relationships." 4. When conforming to Section 4.3 there is no defined way (optional or otherwise) to determine whether the wsa:Address field of an EPR is used as an EPI by only inspecting the EPR. I think being able to do this would be useful to clients.
Submitted By:	David Snelling
Submitted On:	09/22/2006 2:11 PM EDT
Last Modified:	02/01/2007 2:05 PM EST
Closed:	02/01/2007 2:05 PM EST

	Status / Comments		Change Log		Associations		Attachments

Status
Group: *
Status:*	Closed
Category: *
Customer: *
Priority: *	1
Assigned To: *	Andrew Grimshaw
Reported in Release: *
Fixed in Release: *
Estimated Hours: *	0
Actual Hours: *	0

Comments

David Snelling: 02/01/2007 2:05 PM EST
	Comment:	These were addressed in the Last call version, and no further issues arose. Closed Tracker.
	Action:	Update Closed set to 02/01/2007 Status changed from Pending to Closed

None: 11/03/2006 3:00 AM EST

Comment:

Item 1: Done.

Item 2: Done.

Item 3: this would make sense if this reverenced profiles were external, but since these references are internal to the document, I feel this re-
structureing is unnecessary. It would certainly be non-normative. I have not acted on thi item.

Item 4: This issue has come up before (I thnik in a separate (closed) tracker in WS-Naming, but I am off line. In anycase, clinets can be expected to 
discover this through the WSDL of the service supporting the resolver or factory portype. Non-normantive text to this effect was added.


Due to Item 3, I have left the status as "Pending". The WG will need to agree to this negligence on my part.

Action:

Update
Assigned To changed from David Snelling to Andrew Grimshaw

Andrew Grimshaw: 10/02/2006 12:08 PM EDT
	Comment:	Michel will do this
	Action:	Update Assigned To set to David Snelling Status changed from Open to Pending

David Snelling: 09/22/2006 2:11 PM EDT
	Action:	Create

Return

< Previous

Next >