I propose the following alternative text for Appendix I (Appendix H if we remove Appendix A, as proposed in a separate 
tracker):

We explained in the Introduction how the BES specification is designed
to enable the creation of BESs that are compliant with OGSA Base Profiles
via the composition of BES port-types with other appropiate port-types.
To illustrate how this can be done, we explain how an implementor would
create a BES that is compliant with the OGSA WSRF Base Profile.
This material is not intended to be normative.

1) A BES that is to be compliant with the OGSA WSRF Base Profile must
implement, in addition to the BES-Management and BES-Factory
port-types, the WS-ResourceProperties, WS-ResourceLifetime, and
WS-BaseNotification port-types, in a manner compliant with the
OGSA WSRF Base Profile.

2) Implementers MUST also ensure that all attributes given in the
description of the attributes document appear as exactly named
WS-ResourceProperties.  Exactly named here implies that each resource
property must have the QName
{http://schemas.ggf.org/bes/2006/08/bes-management}attr-name where
attr-name is the name of the attribute used inside the attributes
document types (e.g., TotalNumberOfActivities, CommonName, etc.).