Assigned category due to minor expected tweaks as a result of the experience document

It seems that development of standards in this area are too premature for profiling. We will omit them from the basic profile 1.0.

From:     Takuya Mori

This was posted wrt 1323, but has relvance here too.

Hi All,

This message is intended to start the discussion on the WSRF-BP 
Tracker Item #1323 (and hopefully to close it).

TI#1323
Summary:     Communication of assertions
Description: Profiles for common assertions in headers or Proxy Certificate

I'd like to propose to add the following to the WSRF Basic Profile 1.0

----
8.1.x or 8.x Communications of assertions

  Senders MAY send assertions that can be used for policy decisions 
including access control decision by receivers with SOAP messages.

  The assertions MUST be SAML assertions or X509 attribute
certificates and senders and receivers MUST adhere to the Basic
SEcurity Profile or SAML Token Profile Version 1.0 when sending
assertions.

R08xx When communicating SAML assertions, a SENDER and a RECEIVER
      MUST comply with SAML Token Profile Version 1.0

R08xx When communicating X509 attribute certificates, a SENDER and 
      a RECEIVERMUST comply with the Basec Security Profile 
      Version 1.0 Section 5.
----

Here is some background on my proposal.
I think's it is better not to use proxy certificate as a mean for
communication of assertions, because there is no standardized way of 
embedding assertions in X509 certificates as certificate extentions,
thus, developing such a standard would be too costly.

----
    Takuya Mori

Time boxed certificates (short lived certs)