|
|
|
Greg Newby: 05/06/2007 4:46 AM EDT
|
| |
Action: |
Update
resolution changed from PUBLISHED to none (no value)
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 07/13/2005 1:14 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Mass Update
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Closed
close_date changed from - to 2005-07-12 22:14:48
resolution changed from <None> to PUBLISHED
|
|
|
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 11/29/2004 12:28 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Mass Move
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_group changed from ARCH to <None>
artifact_status changed from Closed to Open
assigned_to changed from 111 to 100
Category changed from Informational to <None>
group_artifact_id changed from Submit GGF Draft to Published
resolution changed from Published to <None>
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/24/2004 3:31 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Thanks - this is now published as a replacment for GFD.29. Stacey will move it into the proper location. I appreciate your diligence on this
document!
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/24/2004 3:31 PM EST
|
| |
Attachment: |
GFD.029v2.pdf
(1.58 MB)
|
| |
Action: |
Update
File added set to 495: GFD.029v2.pdf
artifact_status changed from Final Editor Review to Closed
assigned_to changed from 302 to 111
close_date changed from - to 2004-11-24 11:31:05
Priority changed from 1 to -
resolution changed from <None> to Published
|
|
|
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 11/08/2004 1:01 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Greg-
Here is the uploaded version for review before publicaiton.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 10/28/2004 9:49 AM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Pending Info from Authors to Final Editor Review
assigned_to changed from 160 to 302
Priority changed from 2 to 1
resolution changed from Returned to Authors/Group to <None>
|
|
|
Hiro Kishimoto: 10/28/2004 4:50 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Dear GGF Editor,
We are very pleased to re-submit the revised revision of our OGSA usecase document version 1.0. All of public review comments are deliberated by the
OGSA-WG and reflected them into this revision.
Thanks,
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 10/06/2004 1:50 AM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Priority changed from 4 to 2
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 10/06/2004 1:25 AM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_group changed from <None> to ARCH
artifact_status changed from Open to Pending Info from Authors
assigned_to changed from 100 to 160
Category changed from <None> to Informational
resolution changed from <None> to Returned to Authors/Group
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 10/06/2004 1:03 AM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_group changed from ARCH to <None>
assigned_to changed from 302 to 100
Category changed from Informational to <None>
group_artifact_id changed from Published to Submit GGF Draft
resolution changed from Later to <None>
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 10/06/2004 1:03 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Per email from Hiro Kishimoto, this is moved back into active status to await edits (coming soon). Barring problems, I expect we can honor the
request to replace GFD.029 with the revised final document. The email:
> > I am writing the email to tell you a problem of our OGSA tier 1 document.
> > This document finished its public comment review July 8th and OGSA-WG
> > and our ADs measured all comments were minor ones. Thus GFSG approved
> > to publish it. However we are lingering to revise this document and plan to
> > complete this week.
> > During an update, the old version was published as GFD.029 by accident.
> > It does not include any corrections and/or modifications of public comments.
> >
> > We will re-submit really final version of this document next week and
> > we would very much appreciate if you could replace current old
> > one by the new one.
> >
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 10/06/2004 1:03 AM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_group changed from <None> to ARCH
artifact_status changed from Closed to Open
assigned_to changed from 100 to 302
Priority changed from 5 to 4
resolution changed from <None> to Later
|
|
|
Charlie Catlett: 08/09/2004 4:52 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Mass Update
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Priority changed from 1 to 5
|
|
|
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 08/09/2004 11:24 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Mass Update
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Closed
Category changed from <None> to Informational
close_date changed from - to 2004-08-09 11:24:47
|
|
|
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 08/09/2004 11:23 AM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
Mass Move
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_group changed from ARCH to <None>
artifact_status changed from ready to publish to Open
assigned_to changed from 111 to 100
Category changed from Informational to <None>
group_artifact_id changed from Submit GGF Draft to Published
resolution changed from Published to <None>
|
|
|
|
|
Charlie Catlett: 08/06/2004 10:14 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
This document will be published in the GGF Document series
as an INFORMATIONAL type document.
An INFORMATIONAL type document is intended to inform
the community. It is not intended to define any standard
or recommendation, nor does it necessarily represent
community consensus or endorsement.
For more information on the GGF Document Series
see: http://www.ggf.org/documents/
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Charlie Catlett: 08/06/2004 10:14 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Final Editor Review to ready to publish
assigned_to changed from 108 to 111
resolution changed from <None> to Published
|
|
|
David Snelling: 07/29/2004 10:01 AM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Final 15day GFSG Review to Final Editor Review
assigned_to changed from 160 to 108
Priority changed from 2 to 1
|
|
|
|
|
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 07/13/2004 11:42 AM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Public Comment Period to Final 15day GFSG Review
Priority changed from 3 to 2
|
|
|
|
|
David Snelling: 06/07/2004 4:16 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
Priority changed from 5 to 3
|
|
|
David Snelling: 06/07/2004 4:13 PM EST
|
| |
Comment: |
AD Review:
1) The collection of use cases are relevant and address issues that are realistic to the application target.
2) The use cases are presented in a uniform format. The format includes a summary, an overview of the service customers, a collection of scenarios
within each application area, Resources involved in implementing these scenarios, the functional requirements placed by the use case on the
application, a summary of the actual OGSA service that the use case author might expect the architecture to provide, and finally security and
performance considerations associated with the use case.
3) The format reliably provides the designers with topic areas to drive the initial development as well as provide validation in later stages of
design.
4) The areas covered by the use cases cover a very wide range of application, from online gaming to storm modeling.
5) The use cases also target several levels within the architecture, e.g. from end user to services used internally within the system.
6) Additional references are provided for each use case.
7) Most of the use cases are written at a uniform level of detail. Some however, in particular the Service-Based Distributed Query Processing, provide
much more detail. This detail is often valuable.
8) It is apparent from the references that many of the contributions to this document have come from other WGs and RGs within the GGF. This breadth of
community involvement is encouraging.
9) The general breath of areas covered reflects the current trend to include both scientific and industrial/business grid applications.
10) Sections 11.3 and 11.10 are listed as "To be supplied." I don't think this should hold up public comment, but when the second tier use cases are
added, this should be updated.
|
| |
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
David Snelling: 06/07/2004 4:13 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from AD Review to Public Comment Period
assigned_to changed from 160 to 111
|
|
|
Stacey Giannese(disabled): 03/30/2004 1:00 PM EST
|
| |
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Open to AD Review
assigned_to changed from 108 to 160
Priority changed from - to 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
