|
Greg Newby: 05/06/2007 4:46 AM EDT
|
|
Action: |
Update
resolution changed from PUBLISHED to none (no value)
|
|
Greg Newby: 04/22/2006 6:45 PM EDT
|
|
Comment: |
Mass Update
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Closed
close_date changed from - to 2006-04-22 14:45:37
resolution changed from <None> to PUBLISHED
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/27/2006 2:06 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Closed to Open
Category changed from Community Practice to <None>
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/27/2006 2:06 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
group_artifact_id changed from Submit GGF Draft to Published
Priority changed from 5 to -
|
|
Joel Replogle: 03/27/2006 11:07 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Reloaded corrected document to web site on 27 March, 2006.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Joel Replogle: 03/27/2006 11:07 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from ready to publish to Closed
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 100
close_date changed from - to 2006-03-27 11:07:24
Priority changed from 1 to 5
|
|
Greg Newby: 02/13/2006 2:56 AM EST
|
|
Attachment: |
gfd-58.pdf
(147.82 KB)
|
|
Action: |
Update
File added set to 740: gfd-58.pdf
artifact_status changed from Open to ready to publish
Category set to Community Practice
|
|
Greg Newby: 02/13/2006 2:54 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
We didn't get the headers fixed on this; I'm uploading
the "final" versions, for pushing to our final document
series. Sorry for this oversight!
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 02/13/2006 2:54 AM EST
|
|
Attachment: |
gfd-c.058.doc
(111.5 KB)
|
|
Action: |
Update
File added set to 739: gfd-c.058.doc
assigned_to changed from 100 to 9357
Category changed from <None> to Community Practice
group_artifact_id changed from Published to Submit GGF Draft
Priority changed from - to 1
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/24/2006 11:22 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_group changed from Individual Submission to <None>
artifact_status changed from ready to publish to Open
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 100
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 100
Category changed from Community Practice to <None>
group_artifact_id changed from Submit GGF Draft to Published
Priority changed from 1 to -
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/09/2006 5:44 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
This will now be published as GFD-C.058.
Authors/editors: thanks for your efforts! We are looking forward
to actual implementation of these plans in the near future.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/09/2006 5:44 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Final 15day GFSG Review to ready to publish
assigned_to changed from 302 to 9357
Priority changed from 2 to 1
|
|
Greg Newby: 12/06/2005 3:49 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Uploading the mis-tagged .pdf as -10.doc (no other
changes were made).
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 12/06/2005 12:29 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
The GFSG discussed this on December 6, has put
it into a 15-day GFSG last-call. Any discussion before
then might bring it back to the GFSG meeting for
further debate. Or, if there is still rough consensus,
the document will go into final Editor review prior
to publication.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/23/2005 6:53 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Updating priority to "2" rather than "4" -- it
should have been "2" after public comment.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/23/2005 6:53 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 302
Priority changed from 4 to 2
|
|
John Tollefsrud: 11/22/2005 1:37 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
The file dated 2005-11-07 is not a PDF, it is a .DOC.
This doc is a proposed Community Practice, which concerns me. Community Practice documents are described in GFD-1 as "...an approach or process that
is considered to be widely accepted by
consensus and practice in the Grid community." Approval of a CP doc has a very high bar: "The (GFSG ) review will focus on technical and intellectual
quality of the document as well as the extent to which the work truly reflects community-wide practice and support."
Reading the doc of 2005-11-07, I do not see evidence that this document describes a current, widespread community practice. To the contrary, the doc
states "A non-exhaustive survey of current GGF research groups showed that indeed the defined namespaces vary greatly."
This document however seems appropriate as a Proposed Recommendation. It's a worthy proposal and I recommend that it proceed as a PR.
jt
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/21/2005 7:32 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
This document is now in 15-day final
GFSG review, scheduled for discussion
on December 6 or as soon afterwards as possible.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/21/2005 7:32 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Public Comment Period to Final 15day GFSG Review
Priority changed from 3 to 4
resolution changed from Accepted to <None>
|
|
Michel Drescher: 11/07/2005 10:36 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Dear Greg and Joel, and others,
as the Public Comment period of this document has ended, I changed the document according to the comments given so far.
I attached the latest draft 09 to this tracker, and will send the editable MS Word document to Greg and Joel directly.
Cheers,
Michel
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/06/2005 11:06 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Thanks for this submission, and sorry for my
delay in pushing it to the next step. I have
read this document, and believe it is ready
for 60-day public comment. I have also
spoken with the GFSG and the GGF operational
team, and believe there is support for moving forward
with the methods described here.
It would be appropriate and welcome for actual
implementation activities to take place, even while
the document is in public comment.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/06/2005 11:06 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Initial Editor Review to Public Comment Period
assigned_to changed from 302 to 9357
Priority changed from 5 to 3
resolution changed from <None> to Accepted
|
|
Greg Newby: 08/07/2005 6:06 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Initial Editor Review
Priority changed from - to 5
|
|
|
|