|
Greg Newby: 05/06/2007 4:46 AM EDT
|
|
Action: |
Update
resolution changed from PUBLISHED to none (no value)
|
|
Greg Newby: 04/22/2006 6:45 PM EDT
|
|
Comment: |
Mass Update
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Closed
close_date changed from - to 2006-04-22 14:45:37
resolution changed from <None> to PUBLISHED
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/27/2006 2:04 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_group changed from Management to <None>
artifact_status changed from Closed to Open
Category changed from Recommendations Track to <None>
group_artifact_id changed from Submit GGF Draft to Published
Priority changed from 5 to -
|
|
Joel Replogle: 03/27/2006 11:05 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Published as GFD.65 on 27 March, 2006
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Joel Replogle: 03/27/2006 11:05 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from ready to publish to Closed
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 100
close_date changed from - to 2006-03-27 11:05:59
Priority changed from 1 to 5
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/26/2006 10:22 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
This document will now be published
as GFD-R.065. I added the new copyright/IP
statement and adjusted the headers, but made
no other changes.
Thanks to the authors/editors for work
on this document.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/26/2006 10:22 PM EST
|
|
Attachment: |
gfd-r.065.doc
(822 KB)
|
|
Action: |
Update
File added set to 815: gfd-r.065.doc
artifact_status changed from Final Editor Review to ready to publish
assigned_to changed from 302 to 9357
|
|
Greg Newby: 02/28/2006 4:13 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
The GFSG approved this document for publication
on February 28. It is now in final Editor review prior
to publication.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 02/28/2006 4:13 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Final 15day GFSG Review to Final Editor Review
assigned_to changed from 628 to 302
Priority changed from 2 to 1
|
|
John Tollefsrud: 02/27/2006 10:38 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
This document is well written and there should be no impediment to publication from this perspective. The important issue for GFSG approval is the
lack of any public comment. We are accustomed to seeing many comments on documents that need correction; this is not the case here. I agree with the
observation that as a set the CDDLM documents have had good review, and I consider this document to be a consistent member of this set. On this basis
I recommend the GFSG accept.
Thanks -
jt
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 02/12/2006 2:47 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Outcome: based on extensive public comments in the related CDDLM documents, this document is ready to move forward.
It is now in final GFSG review, prior to final editor review
and publication. We'll schedule it for discussion on
February 28 or soon thereafter.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 02/12/2006 2:47 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from AD Review to Final 15day GFSG Review
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/27/2006 9:44 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Just a quick update: I am still discussing this with the
ADs. We hope to have a plan for action withiin the
next few days.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/09/2006 5:38 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
There were zero comments in the public comment tracker:
https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=567
I am assigning the cognizant area directors the task of
determining whether another public comment period is
needed. It might be that the set of four other CDDLM documents
means that a lesser public comment for this document is OK.
Or, we might need to seek out additional comments.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/09/2006 5:38 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Public Comment Period to AD Review
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 628
Priority changed from 3 to 2
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/25/2005 5:26 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from GFSG Review to Public Comment Period
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/20/2005 9:59 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
The GFSG has confirmed this readiness to move
forward to public comment.
It will be due 60 days from public announcement.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/20/2005 9:59 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
assigned_to changed from 628 to 9357
Priority changed from 4 to 3
|
|
John Tollefsrud: 09/12/2005 8:33 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
I've read this document and find it very readable. I recommend it advance to public comment.
jt
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 08/30/2005 11:00 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Thanks for this submission, and I apologize for my delay
in responding. I have read this document, and believe
it is ready for GFSG 15-day review, prior to public comment.
Due from the GFSG Wednesday September 14 (or the GFSG conference
call right afterwards: Tuesday September 20).
There are a few minor formatting issues:
- the GGF intellectual property statement can appear
later, and does not need the GGF logo (see the
sample documents in the Editor tracker, or recent
published documents for examples)
- the page footer (email address & page numbers) needs
to be added
These do not need to be fixed prior to public comment,
unless some larger issues are raised (i.e., during the
GFSG review), but will need to be fixed prior to publication.
If the author/editor would like to submit a revised document,
please go ahead and do so to this tracker.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 08/30/2005 11:00 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_group changed from old-SRM to Management
artifact_status changed from Initial Editor Review to GFSG Review
assigned_to changed from 302 to 628
Priority changed from 5 to 4
|
|
Stuart Schaefer: 07/06/2005 2:00 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
File Deleted changed from 640: draft-ggf-cddlm-component-model.doc to none (no value)
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 06/29/2005 8:24 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Initial Editor Review
Priority changed from - to 5
|
|
|
dejan@hpl.hp.com: 06/28/2005 5:11 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
File added set to 640: draft-ggf-cddlm-component-model.doc
|
|