|
Greg Newby: 04/22/2006 6:52 PM EDT
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Closed
close_date changed from - to 2006-04-22 14:52:50
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/27/2006 2:09 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_group changed from Compute to <None>
artifact_status changed from Closed to Open
Category changed from Informational to <None>
group_artifact_id changed from Submit GGF Draft to Published
Priority changed from 5 to -
|
|
Joel Replogle: 03/27/2006 11:06 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Published as GFD.64 on 27 March, 2006
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Joel Replogle: 03/27/2006 11:06 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from ready to publish to Closed
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 100
close_date changed from - to 2006-03-27 11:06:13
Priority changed from 1 to 5
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/26/2006 8:27 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Thanks to authors/editors for your work on this document.
It will now be published as GFD-I.064.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/26/2006 8:27 PM EST
|
|
Attachment: |
gfd-i.064.doc
(1.05 MB)
|
|
Action: |
Update
File added set to 814: gfd-i.064.doc
artifact_status changed from Returned to Author(s) to ready to publish
assigned_to changed from 320 to 9357
Priority changed from 2 to 1
|
|
Philipp Wieder: 02/10/2006 11:38 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
We are ready with the post public comment review. As far as the GSA-RG is concerned, this doc can be published.
Best regards, Philipp.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/09/2006 8:36 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Hi, Philipp. It means this (from below):
"When you are ready to move this document to final
editor review (or other activity), please post in this
tracker."
Essentially, it just means we're waiting for you. But there
is no implied rush (just keep us informed as you make progress).
I had went through to change from "Author reviewing edits"
to "Returned to authors" in the categories, because I was using
them inconsistently. That's why GridForge notified you of the
change, even though the change didn't imply any change in status.
I'm looking forward to seeing your finished document!
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Philipp Wieder: 01/09/2006 5:59 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Dear Greg,
could you please clarify what the status "Returned to Authors" implies? Currently we are incorporating the comments we got and we do a final proof-
reading.
Best regards, Philipp.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 01/09/2006 5:40 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Pending Info from Authors to Returned to Author(s)
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/23/2005 6:54 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Updating priority to "2" rather than "4" -- it
should have been "2" after public comment.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/23/2005 6:54 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
Priority changed from 4 to 2
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/21/2005 7:27 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Public Comment Period to Pending Info from Authors
Priority changed from 3 to 4
resolution changed from Accepted to <None>
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/21/2005 6:41 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Public comment for this document is now complete.
Authors, please view and respond to comments
here:
https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=561
When you are ready to move this document to final
editor review (or other activity), please post in this
tracker.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 11/21/2005 6:41 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 320
|
|
Philipp Wieder: 09/13/2005 5:23 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Dear Greg,
thank you very much for your comments. I will incorporate the respective changes into the documents.
Best regards, Philipp Wieder.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/12/2005 1:41 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Initial Editor Review to Public Comment Period
assigned_to changed from 302 to 9357
Priority changed from 5 to 3
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/12/2005 1:40 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Note that I got this document via email, and did a little
reformatting before uploading it for Ramin Yahyapou.
This is for the GSA-RG.
I have looked through this document, and have some
suggestions for making it easier to navigate. But these
suggestions don't need to be applied before going
into public comment, so we'll go ahead with public comment
.
Comments will be due 30 days after public announcement.
At that time, the authors/editors can apply my suggested
changes (or respond to them), as well as any other
public comments.
My suggestions mostly concern making one unified document,
rather than several shorter documents. Merge the
references together -- and only keep the references that
are really references (not just Web site URLs. References
must be to static persistent documents). I suggest moving
the references to one unified section at the end, and making
sure to use a unified citation format.
There are some other inconsistencies in the different sections,
so a clean reading, reformatting and so forth will help.
I moved the GGF IP statement & copyright to the end,
and added the brief copyright notice (see any recently
published document for an example).
Thanks for your work on this. It looks like a very useful
document, and I'm looking forward to hearing the outcomes
of the public comment period.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/12/2005 1:40 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Initial Editor Review
resolution changed from <None> to Accepted
|
|
|
|