|
Greg Newby: 05/06/2007 4:46 AM EDT
|
|
Action: |
Update
resolution changed from Accepted to none (no value)
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/11/2006 10:21 AM EDT
|
|
Action: |
Update
Assigned To changed from Joel Replogle to none (no value)
Priority changed from 1 to 0
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/11/2006 10:19 AM EDT
|
|
Action: |
Move
Moved from Submit OGF Draft to Published
Group changed from Security to APME
resolution set to Accepted
Status changed from ready to publish to Closed
|
|
Greg Newby: 09/03/2006 6:39 PM EDT
|
|
Comment: |
This is now published as GFD-I.079. Thanks to the editor for bringing together this BoF report.
|
|
Attachment: |
gfd-i.079.doc
(104.5 KB)
|
|
Action: |
Update
Added an attachment.
Assigned To changed from Greg Newby to Joel Replogle
Status changed from Final Editor Review to ready to publish
|
|
Greg Newby: 05/30/2006 5:15 PM EDT
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Pending Info from Authors to Final Editor Review
Priority changed from 2 to 1
|
|
Von Welch: 05/30/2006 3:53 PM EDT
|
|
Comment: |
New version of the document uploaded with all comments addressed.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Von Welch: 05/30/2006 3:53 PM EDT
|
|
Attachment: |
GGF16-Shib-BOF-Report.doc
(123 KB)
|
|
Action: |
Update
File added set to 868: GGF16-Shib-BOF-Report.doc
assigned_to changed from 497 to 302
|
|
|
Greg Newby: 05/26/2006 1:47 PM EDT
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Public Comment Period to Pending Info from Authors
assigned_to changed from 9357 to 497
Priority changed from 3 to 2
|
|
Von Welch: 05/15/2006 10:34 AM EDT
|
|
Comment: |
From Richard Sinnott:
Other than two "t"s in my name in the text this is fine for me.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Von Welch: 05/11/2006 10:49 PM EDT
|
|
Comment: |
From Erik Vullings:
three minor corrections from my
side in section 2.2:
- Typo: Erik Vullings gave a presentation
-
- The XACML editor is current work, not prior work
- The Claim Transformation Service is very similar to myVocs (which I
didn't know of at that time) so you can maybe refer to it.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Von Welch: 05/11/2006 10:48 PM EDT
|
|
Comment: |
Two typos from Peter Gietz:
chapt. 2.2. 1st para third word: s/game/gave/
chapt. 2.2. 3rd para (2nd para on page 4) last sentence: s/a tool developed to provide uers with/a tool developed to provide users with/
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Mike Jones: 05/11/2006 9:27 PM EDT
|
|
Comment: |
Three comments in total:
1. The term GridSite is used where "Shibboleth integration into GridSite" (or "Shib and GridSite") should be used:
Section 2, Subsection 3.1 (first mention of GridSite).
Two remaining comments on the aesthetics of the document:
2, The strings "x509" and "X509" are used interchangeably throughout, perhaps "X.509" should be used instead.
3, The Project URLs (section 5) some are seen to have been formatted by the underlying editing software and others have not, this should be made
consistant.
No further comments.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Joel Replogle: 04/17/2006 8:35 PM EDT
|
|
Comment: |
Loaded to GGF web site for Public Comment on 17 April, 2006.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/27/2006 12:09 AM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Thanks for this submission. It looks like a useful chronicle
of the BoF, and will be of historical value as Grid+Shib
progresses.
It will go into 30-day public comment. For this type of
document, it's particularly valuable for BoF participants
to confirm through public comment the accuracy of the
text concerning their presentations.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/27/2006 12:09 AM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Initial Editor Review to Public Comment Period
assigned_to changed from 302 to 9357
Priority changed from 5 to 3
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/26/2006 9:09 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
Dear Author or Draft Editor-
Thank you for submitting your draft to the GGF Editor! In most cases the draft
will be assigned to an Area Director for review as the first step in the document
publication process.
The URL provided with this note allows you to track your submission and to
communicate with the GGF Editor or Area Director(s) who are reviewing the
draft. At the very bottom of the tracker display (web page) a detailed log of all
actions related to this submission is available.
You may also wish to alert your colleagues that the draft has been submitted, and from their GridForge accounts they may wish to monitor this item in
order to receive email any time action is taken regarding this submission.
Informational and Experimental drafts are reviewed by the GGF Editor and one
or more Area Directors. The GGF Editor will determine whether the draft is
ready for public comment, or if there are items for the author(s) to address
prior to public comment. This initial review generally takes no more than two
weeks.
Community Practice and Recommendations Track drafts require a GFSG review
prior to public comment. This can add 2-3 weeks to the initial GGF Editor
review depending on current workload of the GFSG.
Please do not hesitate to inquire about the status of your submission at any time by way of comments added to this tracker item, which will be
automatically emailed to the individual who appears in the "assigned to" field.
Thanks very much-
GGF Editor
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Greg Newby: 03/26/2006 9:09 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
artifact_status changed from Open to Initial Editor Review
Priority changed from - to 5
|
|
Von Welch: 03/06/2006 3:34 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Create
|
|
|