Final version, now GFD-I.93.  The attached tgz contains a pdf with changes marked, and a clean version.

Sent another ping to Nathan, Nirag & Derek.

Sent another ping to the submitters.  

Sent a ping to the Nathan & Niraj.

Sorry, but I looked under the Use Cases document posting (https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/?aid=613), and I do not see any comments there, let 
alone any related to this Architecture Document.  If your comments appear elsewhere, please direct me to them.  So at this point I still do not find 
any feedback that I can apply to this document.

Unfortunately, the comments from Steven Newhouse (2005-12-06 14:02:11) seem to apply to a different draft.  Words and line numbers cited below do not 
exist in any of the versions of the document posted to date.  With all due respect there is nothing that we can do to incorporate this feedback.

Updating priority to "2" rather than "4" -- it
should have been "2" after public comment.

Public comment is now complete.  Authors/editors, please
review and respond to comments here:
  https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=565

Or, post responses, along with a changed document, if needed,
in this tracker.  Post here when this document is ready for
the next step (final editor review).

Thanks!  I applied a few more formatting changes.  This
is ready for public comment, and will be due
30 days after it is announced publicly.

You need to add full contact info for the authors/editors
in the section where only Nathan is listed.  Otherwise,
the formatting is good.   The public comment process
will probably result in some questions or recommendations
that are more conceptual in nature.

The edits recommended by the reviewers were incorporated into this version.

Sorry for my long delay in providing feedback on this document.
Here are some comments:

- Category: this seems like an Informational document to
me, and I reclassified it as this in the tracker.  It is
not seeking to define a standard, but is working towards
standardization (aka, draft recommendations) for the 
working group.  Please modify the header appropriately
(following existing documents as models).

- Line numbers: not needed

- Header materials: please see our sample documents or
recently published documents for samples.  You need an
Abstract, and the Full Copyright Notice & IPR statement go
at the end of the document, not the beginning.

- "Definitions" is really a Glossary section, and can go
at the end (you can mention it at the beginning, though)

- By convention, please use latin numerals rather than roman
numerals for section headings (again, see our examples
or recently published documents for examples)

- VII.A. references specific documents or specific WGs within
the GGF.  Please provide full references to these documents
(cited in text, then complete references in the References section).
For non-documents (such as mentioning a working group),
include an in-line citation to the WG URL, but this doesn't
go in the References section.

I would prefer to see these issues addressed before this
document enters a 30-day Public Comment period.  My view
is that the technical content, and overall thrust of the document,
is valuable and suitable for the GGF document series.  It's good
to have these formatting & mechanical issues taken care of before
going into Public Comment, where a more detailed technical
and conceptual review will take place.

Let me know (via email or in this tracker) if you have questions,
feedback or comments.