| |
Comment: |
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:36:39 -0600
To: "Jon MacLaren" <jon.maclaren@man.ac.uk>, "'Bill Nitzberg'" <bill@computer.org>
From: Jennifer Schopf <jms@mcs.anl.gov>
Subject: RE: FW: Revised GESA Milestones
Cc: "'Kate Keahey'" <keahey@mcs.anl.gov>, "'Steven Newhouse'" <sjn5@doc.ic.ac.uk>
Jon et al.
So this still isn't what we need. Currently, these read like an agenda, not milestones. What we need from you is all your document milestones. You can
have other additional milestones, but at the minimum we need your document milestones.
So for example, we would suggest changing
GGF 10: Develop GESA use cases of WS-Agreement in GWD-I. Produce critique of WSA for GESA, feeding requirements to the GRAAP-WG.
to
GGF10: Submit "GESA use cases of WS_AGreement" GWD-I document to editor
And we don't understand the second activity listed here.
Because the steering group is meeting and going over all of the working groups and research groups in GGF very shortly, we need these from you by the
end of the week. If one of you guys had been on the call it would have been useful. Jon's excused because he sent us a note\, but that leaves two
other chairs awol.
Please get back to us as soon as you can
-jen and bill
At 09:04 PM 12/8/2003 +0000, Jon MacLaren wrote:
Jenny, Bill,
This is the final version. I thought the email addressed to you guys - as
opposed to the forwarded message which is clearly addressed to the group -
made this fairly clear. The message forwarded on to you is the one sent to
the list asking for comments on the re-edited milestones. There weren't any
- so I just forwarded that message to you.
Have a look at this, then send us all comments in one go, please.
Thanks,
Jon.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jennifer Schopf [mailto:jms@mcs.anl.gov]
> Sent: 08 December 2003 18:54
> To: Jon MacLaren; Bill Nitzberg
> Cc: Kate Keahey; Steven Newhouse
> Subject: Re: FW: Revised GESA Milestones
>
> Jon-
>
> We're confused- is this the final version? it includes your note
> asking for comments, so we have been waiting for a final one. If this IS
> the final one we'll look it. As a comment, it would help if the documents
> had titles instead of referring to them as just GWD-I, etc. Thanks
>
> -jen and bill
>
>
> At 04:38 PM 11/18/2003 +0000, Jon MacLaren wrote:
> >Bill, Jenny,
> >
> >Here are our more simplistic milestones.
> >
> >Jon.
> >From: "Jon MacLaren" <jon.maclaren@man.ac.uk>
> >To: <gesa-wg@gridforum.org>
> >Subject: Revised GESA Milestones
> >Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:39:05 -0000
> >Message-ID: <001301c3a8f8$73b7b180$06015882@ERIC>
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C3ADF2.54EA7BD0"
> >X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
> >X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> >Importance: Normal
> >X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 00000000827CCCA54118174AAE1D2E012B6136F004223500
> >X-OlkEid: F00422352746721446DD734787A8F3D389A5D0E2
> >
> >Hello All,
> >
> >Our area directors Bill and Jenny have asked us for a revised set of
> >milestones. Here are some proposed ones that Kate, Steven and I have
> come
> >up with, based on the minutes from GGF9. All comments to the list by the
> >end of next Tuesday, please.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Jon.
> >
> >---------
> >
> >GGF 10: Develop GESA use cases of WS-Agreement in GWD-I. Produce
> critique
> >of WSA for GESA, feeding requirements to the GRAAP-WG.
> >
> >GGF 11: Make final decision on whether WSA can form the basis for
> >GESA. Submit GWD-I to GGF editors.
> >
> >GGF 12: Converge on a revised set of interfaces and protocols. Write
> >GWD-I detailing a variety of economic models (e.g. fixed price trading,
> >auction model, etc.) to verify GESA against.
> >
> >GGF 13: Demonstrate that the GESA spec satisfies the models in the
> >GWD-I. Describe any experiences resulting from the implementation of
> GESA
> >as a GWD-E document. Submit these to the GGF editors.
> >
> >GGF 14: Complete and submit the GESA specification document to GGF
> editors
> >as a GWD-C document. Consider transformation into a GWD-R.
> >
> >Note that the GGF12 milestone depends on whether or not WSA is adopted as
> >a basis for GESA; if it is, this effort will be focussed on constructing
> a
> >set of "economic terms" for WSA.
>
>
|
