SourceForge : artf3074: (1742) WS-Name vs. Abstract Name

Project: OGSA-NAMING-WG Trackers > Naming Comments by Frank > View Artifact

Artifact artf3074 : (1742) WS-Name vs. Abstract Name

Tracker:	Naming Comments by Frank
Title:	(1742) WS-Name vs. Abstract Name
Description:	remove and do not use the "WS-Name" definition as it has no more special meaning when the Address can also be viewed as an "abstract-name".
Submitted By:	Mark Morgan
Submitted On:	02/08/2006 11:05 AM EST
Last Modified:	07/18/2006 2:55 PM EDT
Closed:	07/18/2006 2:55 PM EDT

	Status / Comments		Change Log		Associations		Attachments

Status
Group: *
Status:*	Closed
Category: *
Customer: *
Priority: *	0
Assigned To: *	Andrew Grimshaw
Reported in Release: *
Fixed in Release: *
Estimated Hours: *	0
Actual Hours: *	0

Comments

Andrew Grimshaw: 07/18/2006 2:55 PM EDT
	Comment:	WS-Name implies the EPR has an EPI. Therefore, we should leave it as a term.
	Action:	Update Closed set to 07/18/2006 Status changed from Open to Closed

Mark Morgan: 05/01/2006 3:04 PM EDT

Comment:

Frank's Response from Email (28 April 2006)
----------------------------------------------------

Please read my comment again as this has nothing to do with renewable references...
A "name" is not a "EPR"... it's use as one only confuses.

Furthermore, there is nothing "abstract" about the "abstract-name"...
also causes confusion

Action:

Update

Andrew Grimshaw: 03/16/2006 1:54 PM EST
	Comment:	I disagree. The term "WS-Name" implies an EPR with an AbstractName. Whereas a RenewableReference implies an EPR with a Resolver EPR.
	Action:	Update

Andrew Grimshaw: 03/16/2006 1:54 PM EST
	Action:	Update assigned_to changed from 100 to 126

Mark Morgan: 02/08/2006 11:05 AM EST
	Action:	Create

Return

< Previous

Next >