|
Andrew Grimshaw: 07/18/2006 2:56 PM EDT
|
|
Comment: |
done
|
|
Action: |
Update
Closed set to 07/18/2006
Status changed from Open to Closed
|
|
Mark Morgan: 05/01/2006 3:05 PM EDT
|
|
Comment: |
Frank's Response from Email (28 April 2006)
----------------------------------------------------
So we differentiate by return type... isn't the operation name a more intuitive way to address semantical meaning?
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Andrew Grimshaw: 03/16/2006 1:57 PM EST
|
|
Comment: |
I'm not sure I understand the question - though I believe the spec as modified reflects the desire - i.e., that the two resolution porttypes
explicitly have different "types" - one returns a WS-Name, the other a vanilla EPR.
|
|
Action: |
Update
|
|
Andrew Grimshaw: 03/16/2006 1:57 PM EST
|
|
Action: |
Update
assigned_to changed from 100 to 126
|
|
|