SourceForge : artf3072: (1745) resolve-abstract-name TO IRI-to-EPR

Project: OGSA-NAMING-WG Trackers > Naming Comments by Frank > View Artifact

Artifact artf3072 : (1745) resolve-abstract-name TO IRI-to-EPR

Tracker:	Naming Comments by Frank
Title:	(1745) resolve-abstract-name TO IRI-to-EPR
Description:	the IRI passed to the "resolve-abstract-name" should not be specific to an "AbstractName", but should be defined for generic "IRI-to-EPR" resolution. The IRI might alternatively be derived from the Address+RefParameters, or may have been communicated through many different ways that are different from EPR embedding..
Submitted By:	Mark Morgan
Submitted On:	02/08/2006 11:06 AM EST
Last Modified:	07/18/2006 2:57 PM EDT
Closed:	07/18/2006 2:57 PM EDT

	Status / Comments		Change Log		Associations		Attachments

Status
Group: *
Status:*	Closed
Category: *
Customer: *
Priority: *	0
Assigned To: *	Andrew Grimshaw
Reported in Release: *
Fixed in Release: *
Estimated Hours: *	0
Actual Hours: *	0

Comments

Andrew Grimshaw: 07/18/2006 2:57 PM EDT
	Comment:	We do not care how the URI is generated, as long as it conforms to the uniques aspect.
	Action:	Update Closed set to 07/18/2006 Status changed from Open to Closed

Mark Morgan: 05/01/2006 3:06 PM EDT

Comment:

Frank's Response from Email (28 April 2006)
----------------------------------------------------

Please read my comment again...
It states that the interface should be useful for any URI/IRI, not "just" the abstract-name.
In other words, "your" abstract name is just one possible URI to identify the resource and there maybe many, many more, and of those, there could be 
one or more that can be used to resolve.

Action:

Update

Andrew Grimshaw: 03/16/2006 2:01 PM EST
	Action:	Update assigned_to changed from 100 to 126

Andrew Grimshaw: 03/16/2006 2:00 PM EST

Comment:

I disagree most strongly. The whole point of that porttype
WS_Name resolveAbstractName(AbstractName)
is to work with abstract names that are explicitly comparable without having to resort to using RefParameters.

If someone wants to do as suggested - then they should use the other resolution port 
EPR resolve([EPR])
and pass in the EPR.

Action:

Update

Mark Morgan: 02/08/2006 11:06 AM EST
	Action:	Create

Return

< Previous

Next >